Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9178 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2000 21:46:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 21 Jan 2000 21:46:34 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12BlhO-0007cD-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:34:30 +0000 Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.38]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12BlhN-0007c8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:34:29 +0000 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12BlhI-0000aG-0A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:34:25 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3888D0A3.85ED8E7A@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:33:23 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re.Ground Loss References: <000201bf643a$c5701140$29c2883e@lvm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Laurie G3AQC wrote: > I have just measured my TX ant impedance(R term) and it is 120 ohm! > much higher than I originally thought. It is of course all ground > loss . . . . With the simple verticals which I use on 136 kHz, I have always tried to minimise the proximity between the radiator itself and earthy objects such as our house; the garden fence; and nearby trees. From earlier contributions to this Reflector (thanks are due to Peter Martinez G3PLX, and others), I learned that the parallel loss caused by the proximity between the radiator and lossy ground translates into a series-equivalent resistance - which, in turn, contributes to the [120 ohm] "ant impedance". [I hope I have learned my lessons well, Peter!] So improvements to your ground system may help, but it might also be worth taking another look at your antenna to see whether there are opportunities for increasing the distance between your antenna system and nearby (earthy) structures. > . . . . I wonder whether anyone can offer me comparitive > figs for impedance and details of ground systems? Before pruning trees in my neighbour's garden: ********************************************** ANTENNA CONFIGURATION WET DAY DRY DAY 12 m vertical 160 ohm 130 ohm 20 m vertical 130 ohm 100 ohm After pruning trees in my neighbour's garden: ********************************************** ANTENNA CONFIGURATION WET DAY DRY DAY 12 m vertical 130 ohm 100 ohm 20 m vertical 100 ohm 75 ohm Ground system ************* Shack earth is isolated from the antenna ground connection using a matching transformer. 'Cold' end of transformer secondary winding is connected to outside water tap. For more information, see: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/experi_vert.htm The trees (prior to pruning) can be seen just behind (apple tree), and to the right (flowering cherry tree), of my vertical antenna at: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/pictures/expvert1.jpg Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG