Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18391 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 20:11:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 Jan 2000 20:11:43 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12AILx-00024N-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:02:17 +0000 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12AILv-00024I-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:02:15 +0000 Received: from [195.44.222.182] (helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12AILr-0006Gm-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:02:12 +0000 Message-ID: <3883D76C.E608FA8@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:01:00 -0800 From: "g3kev" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Transatlantic References: <3.0.1.16.20000117105039.0817cf64@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik Strobbe wrote: > The best way to find out wether we can cross the pond on 136kHz is to try it. > What I have in mind is a transatlantic test, similar to what we did last > year in cooperation with N4ICK, but with a much larger group of listeners > at the W/VE side. There are plenty of 'lowfers' in USA/Canada that are well > equipped for listening in the 160-190kHz segment, it should not be too hard > for them to adapt their receivers/antennas to 136kHz. > So my suggestion is that we take a weekend (somewhere in february ?) that > the Europeans transmit on 136kHz and the Americans listen (look) for us. > We can announce this event via this reflector, the LCWA webpage, the AMRAD > webpage and eventually also via topband reflectors. > > Best chances will be using slow-CW techniques at our side and have the > Americans looking for us using GRAM or similar software. > Regarding transmitting antennas, stations with long horizontal wires also > produce very good signals, not only the sky-high verticals. Your neighbour just down the road would agree but long haul DX no chance !!! > So I think > there will be a lot more suitable stations than the 'happy few' on Mal's > list. Besides half a dozen UK stations (including GW4ALG if he can use his > 'balloon antenna') there are EI0CF, the 3 SM's and the 2 OH's. For these > last the distance may be more, but they have the advantage of their more > northern position with a (part of the) propagation path that is in the dark > for almost 24h/day. > > So, what do you think of this idea ? Will we set a weekend and try to get > the Americans listening (looking) for us ? > > 73, Rik ON7YD