Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24948 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2000 18:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 5 Jan 2000 18:55:41 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125vUp-0007pT-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:49:23 +0000 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125vUo-0007pO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:49:22 +0000 Received: from [195.44.214.9] (helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125vUl-00075q-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:49:20 +0000 Message-ID: <38740255.E470F291@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:47:49 -0800 From: "g3kev" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: The 137.0 signal ??? more References: <3.0.1.16.20000105105623.2c7f712a@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All. The signal on 137 khz. I have heard this signal before. Yesterday it was about S5 about 1500/1700 utc and then it was about S8 during the evening 1900/2200utc. It could be spurious from another signal on lf. Those with df loops might be able to give, at least a direction. The commercial operators could locate it precisely. A simple system like SSL would be able to give a distance and location. Does anyone have this facility or know of one who has. At this frequency a couple of simple loop antennas or more dispersed around europe could give a fairly accurate fix. No speculation needed. Rik Strobbe wrote: > I monitored the 137kHz 'mistery signal' last night : > 1. Although it sounds RTTY-like I cannot see any mark /space lines with GRAM > 2. It came out of the noise arround 21.30UT and built up (with some QSB > periods) until 23.00UT (when I went to bed). I left the ON5OO software > running all night (from 22UT until 08UT) the signal was still there (and > loud) at that time. > I will have a look at the data from the ON5OO software tonight. > > At 21:43 4/01/00 -0000, you wrote: > > Hi all, the mystery grows deeper...I enclose a copy of an e-mail from > >Jon... > >-------------------------------------------------- > >Well, I can confirm that this is *not* CFH. Our transmitter is > >still powered off. I had to call the site as all I have here is again > >wideband noise. It is drizzling and when you walk by the high-voltage > >transmission lines, you can actually hear the water accumulated on the > >insulators fizzing off. I can't wait to move out to the countryside! > >................................ > > > >Best wishes, Jon - VE1FTL > >------------------------------------------------------ > >Mmmm interesting.... we know from some other comments that there are other > >stations on that frequency....but to my remembrance they were located on the > >West Coast, San Diego way I think!! > >The signal is already visible on my display (2130z) but I forgot to activate > >a scroll back so I can't look to see when it appeared first. I was too busy > >watching 'Horizon' . The modulation is certainly not what we are used to > >seeing from CFH. It is either a more complex data mode or maybe Fax. I have > >a display of a band of 'noise dots' about 60Hz wide at its present weaker > >strength. Not a bit like RTTY which gives two distict lines for the mark and > >space freqs. > >Any other ideas?? > >Cheers de Alan G3NYK JO02PB > >Alan.Melia@btinternet.com > > > > > > > >