Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13472 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 15:11:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 Jan 2000 15:11:54 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12ADcK-0008T5-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:58:52 +0000 Received: from as-img-3.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.146] helo=spamgaac.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12ADcJ-0008T0-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:58:51 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spamgaac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.7) id JAA26647 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:58:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:58:27 -0500 From: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: PA0SE and DK8KW field strength observations combined To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200001170958_MC2-9511-42B5@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Mike and all others interested in their performance (signal-wise), thank you for your comments. I knew this 1 W ERP line and the measurements would create some discussions ;-) Mike, G3XDV wrote: >So, is there something wrong with the 1W ERP line or with our ERP >calculations, or with the signal measurements? My money is on the >1W line being too high, but perhaps Geri and others with bigger >brains than me can come up with the answer.< well, as far as I recall, I developed the estimated 1 W ERP line from some assumptions: 1. I assumed that everybody sticks to the law and the highest signal levels would roughly be in the 1 Watt ERP range 2. I used the CCIR curves for signal strength vs. distance to estimate how a 1 Watt ERP signal would develop vs. distance 3. I tried to find a "best fit" so that I have an envelope curve fitting to the strongest signals in the U.K. and OH assuming those would be coming close to 1 Watt ERP. 4. The difference between the 1 W ERP line and the commercials is approximately 40 to 45 dB, this would come close to the 25 to 100 kW ERP (?) those stations might have. Alan, G3NYK has asked me to supply a graph with a logarithmic distance scale, which I will put on that page (http://www.qru.de/signals.html) later today. Alan mentioned that my 1W ERP line drops at 30dB per decade while 20 dB per decade would fit better for most of the signals, so that this might give another picture (I will play around with these figures a little bit tonight). On the other hand, there is Vaino's (OH2LX) comment, that according to his long-lasting experience it is not possible to estimate a station's ERP from the field strength at a far distance ... Anyhow, what you can do ois to compare you own signal to the signal of a neighbor station, especially, if the measurments were taken in the same instance (as Dick did it). My measurments might be a little bit misleading in this respect, because they were taken over a long period of time. However, the results did fit very nicely ... and shows the poor German's QRP situation, too (provided we all stick to the law ... ;-). Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)