Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29054 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2000 19:29:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 23 Jan 2000 19:29:16 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12CSYC-00071Q-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:19:52 +0000 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de ([194.25.134.17]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12CSYB-00071L-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:19:51 +0000 Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 12CSY7-00016I-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:19:47 +0100 Received: from (087321565-0001@[62.158.198.117]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 12CSXt-1KQGtVC; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:19:33 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 References: <000201bf643a$c5701140$29c2883e@lvm> Subject: Re: LF: Re.Ground Loss X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:19:33 +0100 Message-ID: <12CSXt-1KQGtVC@fwd01.sul.t-online.de> X-Sender: 087321565-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear Lawrence, remembering the few results on ground resistance measurements published on this server I would regard your 120 ohms somewhat above average for 136 kHz. My own value is in the order of 80 ohms when using the house ground, and also when using an insulated radial system consisting of 28 wires of 10 m to 30 m in length, depending on the space in the relevant direction. Someone who had used his 160 meters ground system with several long buried radials also for LF had reported a value of 50 ohms at 136 kHz. I have just heard of two reports of house grounds of about 25 ohms; in this cases a tube 12 meters deep into the ground is employed, or an extended wire ground system also deep in the ground. Paralleling different grounds may be a special problem. Direct paralleling often results in an INCREASE in ground resistance. Therefore some stations use link or transformer coupling between feeder cable (connected to the house ground) and the antenna ground, to avoid the bad effect of direct paralleling. But if both ground systems are tuned against each other the resulting resistance may be the same as one ground system alone, or luckily somewhat lower, but never the value that is expected due to the paralleling of two resistances. >>From next spring onward I will do further experiments with bare radials buried flat into the ground, before settling on a final solution. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB LAWRENCE MAYHEAD schrieb: > I have just measured my TX ant impedance(R term) and it is 120 ohm! much > higher than I originally thought.It is of course all ground loss,I am using > 3 ground rods close to the TX and the house water/mains system.I wonder > wether anyone can offer me comparitive figs for impedance and details of > ground systems? > To improve I will have to put in an awful lot of radials! or consider > counterpoises. > 73s Laurie. >