Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19648 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2000 18:45:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 5 Jan 2000 18:45:02 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125vL4-0007jl-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:39:18 +0000 Received: from mb09.swip.net ([193.12.122.212]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125vL3-0007jg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:39:17 +0000 Received: from win95 (d212-151-55-95.swipnet.se [212.151.55.95]) by mb09.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA27469 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 19:38:14 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <002301bf57ac$90f61120$5f3797d4@win95.swipnet.se> From: "Christer Andersson" To: "RSGB LF group" Subject: LF: 137,0 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 19:40:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello All, I believe most of the LF guys have a rotary loop antenna. Couldn't we make some observations on the direction of the unknown signal and then compare the results? Or is the signal too weak? By the way, I have applied for license to transmit between 7-8,5 kHz and today I received a letter from the authorities where they asked me for more information such as the exact location for the transmitter. So it seems rather promising I think. 73 Christer sm6pxj