Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8727 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 11:12:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 Jan 2000 11:12:14 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12A9yB-0006rA-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:05:11 +0000 Received: from mail11.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.23]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12A9yA-0006r5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:05:10 +0000 Received: from modem-85.longnose-hawk.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.40.85] helo=lvm) by mail11.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 12A9y6-00010R-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:05:06 +0000 Message-ID: <000201bf60da$aebb22e0$5528893e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: G3KEV LF Transatlantic. Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:02:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Whilst I agree that height is very important from the transmit point of view,please dont forget the recieving problem,where big is not neccessarily best! I dont think we should discourage anyone, In fact I should like to see listening tests on this side ,with others possibly without big antennas joining in. 73s Laurie.