Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11602 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2000 09:14:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 8 Jan 2000 09:14:41 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 126rpJ-0005iL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2000 09:06:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.91]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 126rpI-0005iG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2000 09:06:24 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from telemetry.demon.co.uk ([194.222.19.114]) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 126rpF-000P43-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:06:22 +0000 Message-ID: <$RGBICAM3vd4EwmE@telemetry.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 09:05:16 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Tom Boucher" Subject: Re: LF: Re: AMRAD Antenna ? In-reply-to: <3876554B.72D98BF3@bellatlantic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike (32) Trial Version 3.05 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >From Tom, G3OLB Andre I'm not at all clear how this antenna is matched and fed. I am particularly interested because I currently use an 1100 ft end fed wire which I could conceivably extend to a full quarter wave. Like yours it is suspended from a number of trees but high voltages are not a particular problem because I have it well insulated with some good ceramic insulators (thanks Dick!) There are also cows in my field but they are a well insulated breed. Your 1600 ft antenna is approaching a quarter wavelength long and, as Dave says, opposite ends of a quarter wave antenna will present opposite impedances i.e. if you leave the far end open, the near end will look like a low impedance and conversely if you ground the far end, the near end will be high Z. So I cannot reconcile grounding BOTH ends and being able to resonate it. 73, Tom G3OLB In message <3876554B.72D98BF3@bellatlantic.net>, Andre' Kesteloot writes >Wooops, >I guess I did not express myself quite clearly enough. >The far end of the wire terminates in a field , (and specifically near a pond) >visited by many cows. In order to avoid any possible unpleasantness (wire >falling on the ground if broken by the wind, etc.), we decided to ground that >end. >It may well be that the whole thing operates as a loop of sorts, as there is a >non-zero resistance between the two grounds (the one at the Tx site, and the one >at the pond end) >73 >Andre' > >Dave wrote: > >> Surely the Voltage gradient is just the same but the other way round? High >> current point at the earthed end and high Voltage point at the TX site as it >> is about a quarter wave.... >> The "earthed at the far end" idea has been used with topband antennas for >> years in order to get the current into the vertical drop. >> >> 73 Dave G3YXM. > > > >