Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9754 invoked from network); 6 Dec 1999 12:06:29 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 6 Dec 1999 12:06:29 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11uwl2-0005jL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 11:56:44 +0000 Received: from mserv1b.u-net.net ([195.102.240.137]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11uwl0-0005jG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 11:56:42 +0000 Received: from rsgb.u-net.com ([195.102.80.225] helo=rsgb.org.uk) by mserv1b.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #63) id 11uwlg-000284-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:57:25 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R) for ; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 11:39:26 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:39:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: Weekend report 3-5 December X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Message-ID: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Not much time for going on the air this weekend but highlights were: Friday Heard OH3LYG for the first time (549). He did not reply to my call. Saturday Spent all day working at RSGB AGM, but managed interesting eyeball QSOs with LFers G3YMC and G4JNT. Sunday During a brief period of insomnia at 0300, heard GW4ALG calling DL1SAN. Steve was 599 but nothing heard of the DL. The Greek RTTY was 10dB up on normal evening levels. Later in the day heard two new ones: DK5PT (429), and M0BMU (5 9+10 9) who is about 10km away from me - real QRM at last! Saw VCW from ON7YD. I will put up a picture of this which shares the screen with two conventional QRSs QSOs on my web site this evening. I found it difficult to decode with 8Hz dot/dash spacing because the spacing was a greater screen distance than the length of a dot (element). Would be interesting to experiment with much closer spacing. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm