Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17217 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1999 21:24:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by 212.159.2.33 with SMTP; 16 Dec 1999 21:24:54 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yiky-0006eD-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:48:16 +0000 Received: from front2m.grolier.fr ([195.36.216.52]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yikq-0006e8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:48:13 +0000 Received: from club-internet.fr (ppp-44-28-109.wmar.club-internet.fr [213.44.28.109]) by front2m.grolier.fr (8.9.3/No_Relay+No_Spam_MGC990224) with ESMTP id WAA07469 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:14:32 +0100 (MET) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <385956A6.B294C6A@club-internet.fr> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:17:32 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "M & S" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [fr] (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: fr,fr,es-ES MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: getting permission OK References: <383CEEAC.71F1E02F@club-internet.fr> <012501bf43e5$dcf0bec0$0600a8c0@main> <3854B5A4.E96DBDFC@club-internet.fr> <003801bf45a2$bd0fa1c0$0600a8c0@main> <3858FDF5.754B0F11@club-internet.fr> <003c01bf47e1$95899a20$2301a8c0@maly.gmc.net> <38593BAA.C0302AD5@netscapeonline.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Yes , the "French Connection" looks tricky. I must admit that the person to who I talked on the phone said: "I thought that everybody was already QRV on 136"... If you see what I mean, we could be able to transmit on these frequencies, but with the risk of being fined (there are several control sites in France, and no, you can't say that you've eaten a cornish pie at lunch on 80 metres)... 73, Mark, F6JSZ malcolmg3kev a *crit : > > Hi Petr. I had a similar experience in Canada. I phoned the Telecoms Dept in > Vancouver and asked what the procedure was for getting a recipocal licence. The > Inspector said JUST go ahead and transmit. When I enquired about a visit to the > Telecoms Office to confirm my valid G3KEV and VS6HI licence, he said it was not > necessary hi - JUST GO AHEAD AND TRANSMIT ETC . I did what he said and never had > a problem hi. In contrast to get a Singapore licence you had to be sworn in by a > Magistrate and take an oath of allegiance to the Singapore Government besides > having the appropriate qualifications, over the border in Malaya is was totally > relaxed and no formalities were required except to have the qualifications. The > French connection looks tricky. > 73 de Mal/G3KEV/9V1OY/9M2CC > > Petr Maly wrote: > > > Hello Lowfers > > Nice story, isn't it. I can tell my own. In spring this year I called to CTU > > (PTT) to get permission for transmitting on 136 kHz. The YL on the other > > side told me that she is very, very busy and that I would have best to call > > again in autumn. But I did not give up and I called her again and again. At > > last, to get rid of me, she said something like: "OK then, transmit there > > and don't bother me any longer". That's all my permission. I have nothing > > written in my hand till now. I even don't know till now what one must comply > > with to get permission in OK. No one knows. Maybe, my transmission is > > illegal and all my "firsts" will be cancelled. Who knows... > > > > 73, Petr, OK1FIG > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: M & S > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 3:58 PM > > Subject: LF: French update > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I've just had a long conversation with the guy who's responsible for the > > > Amateur Service here in France, at the ministry of telecommunications. > > > > > > The situation is more complicated than I previously announced. In fact, > > > the ART (French equivelant of OFTEL) has made several demands towards > > > the Agence Nationale des Frequences (French equivalent of the RA) > > > regarding the use of the 136 kHz band in France by amateurs. > > > > > > I phoned the ANF, and nobody there seemed to know what I was talking > > about! > > > > > > Well, I'm one of those "bad" journalists who never give up: I gave a > > > call to the ministry. The minister didn't want to speak to me so they > > > connected me to the press service. Again, nobody was able to understand > > > a word about what I was talking about (are we lowfers so bizarre?). > > > > > > Finally, after five phone calls, around eight or nine different > > > services, fifteen or so different people and twenty-five times > > > explaining the same thing, I managed to get a short piece of information > > > from an official source. > > > > > > Read this: "the 136 kHz band will definately be allocated to the amateur > > > service in France. I'm surprised that so many european countries are > > > already active. However, our request has been published. All we need now > > > is a signature from the Prime Minister. He does have the papers on his > > > desk since a couple of months. The question is, how many papers have > > > been loaded on top of the 136 kHz file..." > > > > > > So, 136 in France can be authorised tomorrow, like it can be authorised > > > in December 2000. However, we're quite sure right now that it will be > > > authorised whatsoever. > > > > > > Wait and see. > > > > > > 73, Mark, F6JSZ > > > Editor, French CQ > > >