Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17365 invoked from network); 2 Dec 1999 23:02:15 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 2 Dec 1999 23:02:15 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11teww-0004Mt-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 22:43:42 +0000 Received: from mail1-gui.server.ntli.net ([194.168.222.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11tewv-0004Mo-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 22:43:41 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from cableol.co.uk ([194.168.18.64]) by mail1-gui.server.ntli.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-33929U70000L2S50) with ESMTP id AAA13113 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 22:27:56 +0000 Message-ID: <3846F0BE.CC3C3209@cableol.co.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 22:20:46 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "LF Group" Subject: LF: QRV 03:00 5th December References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Wolf DL1SAN wrote: > . . . what about a sked on sunday morning at 3:00 UTC? How will we > proceed to reach a high probability of qso? > Yes! Hopefully, propagation will be as good as when Christer and I did a similar test two weeks ago. I hope to be QRV from 03:00 - 05:00 UT, Sunday 5th December on 136.8 kHz, +/- QRM [!], weather permitting. I will call DL1SAN for 5 minutes starting at 03:00 & 03:30. I will listen for DL1SAN for 5 minutes starting at 03:05 & 03:35. Each time, I will listen first on my TX frequency, then carefully tune 136.2 to 137.4 kHz. At other times, I will either be sending CQ calls, or listening for other 'early birds'. (I hope some other TXing/RXing stations will be able to join in the fun too!) To increase the probability of a QSO if copy is difficult, I find that the following procedure works well: 1) start and end the first transmission(s) with 3 x 3 callsigns (e.g. N4ICK N4ICK N4ICK DE GW4ALG GW4ALG GW4ALG); 2) once you are sure that both callsigns have been copied correctly, start and end each over with 1 x 1 callsigns (e.g. ZL4MD DE GW4ALG); 3) if you think that one of the callsigns is in doubt, use 1 x 3; or 3 x 1 callsigns, as appropriate; 4) send two 'K's at the end of each transmission; 5) only send the outgoing report (i.e. do not re-send the incoming report), and send it at least five times at each attempt; and, 6) only send a series of 'R's when you are sure that you have copied the other station's callsign - and your incoming report - correctly. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG steve.rawlings@cableol.co.uk