Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2989 invoked from network); 9 Dec 1999 11:18:16 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 9 Dec 1999 11:18:16 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11w1O6-00086e-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:05:30 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11w1O5-00086Z-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:05:29 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA121358 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 12:05:17 +0100 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.19991209130420.2ca7341e@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 13:04:20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: LF: DFCW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: After consulting DF8ZR and DF6NM, who both are also active in DFCW, I would like to suggest a kind of temporary DFCW standard in order to enhance DFCW QSO's and avoid 'collisions' with other modes : 1. To use a DFCW 'subband' from 137650Hz to 137695Hz, this will avoid collosions with QRSS actovity that is mainly between 137700Hz and 137800Hz. 2. To use a frequency shift of 4Hz. At this moment this seems to be narrow enough to minize the bandwidth of DFCW and wide enough to be properly separated by receiveing software as GRAM. Als a 4Hz shift is easy to implement with PLL-VFO systems that work in 1Hz steps (as you just have to toggle the 3rd byte). 3. To use a 'channel spacing' of 10Hz. This would mean that we have 5 'channels' going from 137650/137654Hz to 137690/137694Hz. Working with 'channels' will minimize interference between DFCW signals while the 10Hz 'step' is enough to separate 2 DFCW signals even if there is a slight drift on one of the transmitters. 4. To use a 3 second 'element length' separated by a 1 second 'gap'. From QRSS we know that 3 seconds dot length is optimal for most receiving software. The 1 second 'gap' will make visual detection of the signal easier and also reduce the dutycycle a bit, avoiding overheated PA's. 5. To introduce following practice for weak signal work : If you receive a CQ from a station and you are not sure to be 'seen' at the other end, just send a 'KK'. If the other station can read the 'K' it should reply the with 'RR' as confirmation. After that the station that sent the 'K' can reply to the CQ. This procedure is suggested by Markus, DF6NM, and can pervent idle transmissions and useless QRM. eg. CQ ON7YD K KK RR ON7YD DF6NM OOO K etc... 73, Rik ON7YD