Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6013 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 12:11:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 12:11:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 122Cre-0003tI-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:33:34 +0000 Received: from mb09.swip.net ([193.12.122.212]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 122Crd-0003tD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:33:33 +0000 Received: from win95 (d212-151-47-13.swipnet.se [212.151.47.13]) by mb09.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA06215 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 1999 13:00:40 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <000f01bf4f99$4f1aa4c0$0d2f97d4@win95.swipnet.se> From: "Christer Andersson" To: "RSGB LF group" Subject: LF: Below 9 kHz Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 13:03:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello all, I have a small question. What stops us from beginning experimenting on, say, 8 kHz? If I have understood things right, frequencies below 8,999 kHz is not allocated by the ITU, neither regulated by national administrations. 73 Christer SM6PXJ