Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15824 invoked from network); 1 Nov 1999 00:00:06 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 1 Nov 1999 00:00:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 19907 invoked from network); 1 Nov 1999 00:08:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 1 Nov 1999 00:08:37 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11i4jL-0004NW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:49:47 +0000 Received: from mailout00.btx.dtag.de ([194.25.2.148]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11i4jK-0004NR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:49:46 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from fwd09.btx.dtag.de ([194.25.2.169]) by mailout00.btx.dtag.de with smtp id 11i4jF-0007Xc-00; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 00:49:41 +0100 Received: (087321565-0001(btxid)@[212.184.146.181]) by fwd09.btx.dtag.de id ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 00:49:30 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 00:49:30 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002901bf232f$ac55c340$8aeb869f@beachwood.tinet.ie> Subject: Re: LF: re: 500khz X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sender: 087321565-0001@t-dialin.net From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear Finbar et AL; THE POWER OF WCC and WSL I have taken from a 1959 list of coast and ship stations, volume 1, coast stations. Concerning a medium wave band, as stated on another occasion (DK8KWs medium wave tx), we should choose a frequency sufficiently far from the 450 kHz to 468 kHz I.F. range of receivers, therefore I had pleaded for 410 kHz (or somewhat higher). 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB Stations like > Chatham WCC and Amaganset WSL, were mentioned, but their power levels were > exceptional, just imagine 30-40 kw, a bit over the top , and to be quite > honest, their signals never struck me as being that much more potent than > the rest. How about a new band around 440 khz. After 136 khz it would be a > breeze. > > 73 Finbar EI0CF EJM > >