From: "ComPact" <Melv@xtra.co.nz>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: visual-CW
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 16:43:32 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <19991115034209.NAZJ457558.mta4-rme@locxvcym>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hello Rik
you wrote:
>Another alternative is replacing the discrimation of dashes and dots from
>the time-domain to the frequency domain. This would mean that 'dashes' and
>'dots' have the same length (3 seconds) but that they are transmitted on
>different frequencies. Since in visual-CW the frequency discrimination is
>very high a shift of 5Hz (or even less) is sufficient. Using this
technique
>we do not need the 'time-gaps' between the dashes and dots, only between
>characters we would need a 'time-gap' of 1 dot and a 2 dot 'time-gap'
>between words.

It seems that some similar thinking is going on on both sides of the world
on this topic. We have been using for some time a combination of
Spectrogram and small frquency shifts as a positive means of identifying
weak trans-Tasman LF signals. Also you will have noted Steve Olney's
extensive work in this area.

I am a little confused about the tests you describe Rik. If you eliminate
the time gaps between a string of dots then you just get a long dash so I
assume you are shifting frequency after each "element" rather than one
frequency for dots and another for dashes?

Mike ZL4OL