Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24162 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 10:47:09 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 10:47:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 10657 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 09:46:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 09:46:47 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Z9XC-0002jJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Oct 1999 10:08:22 +0100 Received: from mserv1a.u-net.net ([195.102.240.34]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Z9XA-0002jE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Oct 1999 10:08:21 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from rsgb.u-net.com ([195.102.80.225] helo=rsgb.org.uk) by mserv1a.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #63) id 11Z9Y5-0001Wl-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 10:09:18 +0100 Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R) for ; Thu, 07 Oct 1999 10:08:05 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Radio Society of Great Britain To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 10:08:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: 73kHz - bad news In-reply-to: <199910061731_MC2-87E4-281B@compuserve.com> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Message-ID: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: G2AJV wrote: > Thank you for the possible explanation of the 73 kHz blackout. I wonder > if Rugby may have started to use spread spectrum in parallel with its > normal system. Funnily enough, that is a possibility that Peter, G3LDO, and myself were discussing this morning. The noise appears to decay fairly linearly with frequency, whereas I might expect it to be more exponential if it were oscillator sidebands. > I then climbed > the ladder to adjust the situation when suddenly the ladder slipped and I > travelled in a beautiful arc, landing on my shoulder, then my head and > finally the rest of me! No real damage - just a bit of a headache, > stiffness and aching but I got a severe ticking off from my wife. > I'll have to sneak out tomorrow but will not be able to do any tests > before about 11 a.m. Take care!! > From what you say about Rugby , Mike, it seems that all the > overhauling that I've been doing on my rig for the past few months may > have been a fool's errand. Your report on the very high background noise > level makes much more sense but was completely unexpected. Hmm, you may be right. I'm not sure when the noise level increased as I had not been on 73 for a few months but I was puzzled that G0MRF received me so weakly a few weeks ago. > I will try to ensure that my system is on top form for the H.F. > Convention on Sunday morning but, after the experience of the last few > months, and especially the last few days, I do not anticipate much luck. I will take my crude but effective 1m loop antenna with me in case that helps the convention station on 73. I am determined to have some more QSOs on 73 before we lose it so will concentrate on noise reduction by (1) directivity, (2) cancellation and (3) DSP. In the meantime, we need to use frequencies as low as possible. The experience of the convention station may be useful in determining what (and how bad) the problem is. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm