Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6907 invoked from network); 8 Oct 1999 06:52:45 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 8 Oct 1999 06:52:45 +0100 Received: (qmail 6401 invoked from network); 8 Oct 1999 05:52:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 8 Oct 1999 05:52:26 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11ZSaH-0004mc-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Oct 1999 06:28:49 +0100 Received: from as-img-rel-1.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.142] helo=spamraaa.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11ZSaG-0004mX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Oct 1999 06:28:48 +0100 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spamraaa.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.0) id BAA27480 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 01:28:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dave (host212-140-85-222.host.btclick.com [212.140.85.222]) by spamraaa.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.0) with SMTP id BAA27443 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 01:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000301bf114d$cc482f60$de558cd4@dave> From: "Dave Sergeant" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: 73KHz skeds Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 19:31:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >From Dave G3YMC I gather from later mails that the tests between G3LDO and G3XDV may have been on QRSS. If that were the case then the interrupted carriers I heard on Tuesday and Wednesday may well have been them, and would have been Q5 copy on normal CW (admittedly buried somewhat in the noise). Since I also had various carriers around that frequency from local TVs (including a couple being soak tested downstairs!) it was not possible to attempt to copy the slow CW by ear. Point to note - identification in normal CW at frequent intervals would have helped very much in this case. 73s Dave G3YMC sergeantd@compuserve.com http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/sergeantd