Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25622 invoked from network); 8 Sep 1999 16:43:27 -0000 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by murphys.force9.net with SMTP; 8 Sep 1999 16:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 1371 invoked from network); 8 Sep 1999 16:42:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 8 Sep 1999 16:42:15 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Okcy-0005Jm-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Sep 1999 17:31:20 +0100 Received: from nms.rz.uni-kiel.de ([134.245.1.2]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Okcx-0005Jh-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Sep 1999 17:31:19 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from srv1.mail.uni-kiel.de by nms.rz.uni-kiel.de with Local-SMTP (PP); Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:30:33 +0200 Received: from nephro.uni-kiel.de (PC10862.dial.uni-kiel.de [134.245.108.62]) by srv1.mail.uni-kiel.de (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA14798 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:30:57 +0200 (MET DST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <37D68F1B.6EB09595@nephro.uni-kiel.de> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 18:30:19 +0200 From: "Peter W. Schnoor" Organization: University of Kiel, Clinic of Nephrology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: former/future usage of german LF frequencies References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Gang, Thank you Gamal, Soegiono, Gamal wrote: > (8) frequency 131,400 kHz > station site Kiel > bandwidth / modulation 600H F1B-- > max power into antenna + 30.0 dBW > > (9) frequency 136,800 kHz > station site Pinneberg > bandwidth / modulation 500H A1B-- > max power into antenna + 31.8 dBW Oopss...! > Isn't frequency (9) right inside the frequency range > allocated to the radio amateur service (on a > secondary basis) ??? Yes! (8) is located approx. 15km N, (9) approx. 75km S from here...! > What does this say to us in lieu of usability of the > LF band in future ??? Euphemistic spoken: A real challenge at my location! > On the other side it may throw a shadow on possible future > usage as well and give an impress on what we may expect > (more QRM) on the LF range in the future. No comments from here, starting to pray... 73 from Kiel, Peter, DF3LP