Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10883 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 21:57:54 -0000 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by murphys.force9.net with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 21:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 28627 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 21:56:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 21:56:28 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Njxx-00003v-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Sep 1999 22:36:49 +0100 Received: from cask.force9.net ([195.166.128.29]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Njxx-00003q-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Sep 1999 22:36:49 +0100 Received: (qmail 30780 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 21:36:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prstesv1) (212.56.119.17) by cask.force9.net with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 21:36:38 -0000 Message-ID: <00e701bef7e7$3ac13840$0600a8c0@prstesv1.prestel.co.uk> From: "Dave" To: "LF Group" Subject: LF: 80mtr Net Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 22:40:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear all, I agree with Dick and Alan that it would be good to have an 80m net again. The questions are; when and where? For my pennyworth, I suggest mid Sunday evening and somewhere low in the 80m band, 3646 and 3675 seemed clear of funny noises when I listened this evening but this may vary around Europe. Anyone else have a view? Dave, G3YXM