Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17665 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 11:04:34 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 1999 11:04:34 +0100 Received: (qmail 22559 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 10:03:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 30 Sep 1999 10:03:33 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11WcuP-0007DV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:53:53 +0100 Received: from smtp.mail.big-orange.net ([143.179.236.32] helo=Lesothosaurus.big-orange.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11WcuO-0007DQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:53:53 +0100 Received: from w8k3f0 ([143.179.150.240]) by Lesothosaurus.big-orange.net (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with SMTP id AAA4D6B for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:53:44 +0200 Message-ID: <003801bf0b2a$da1367a0$f096b38f@w8k3f0> From: "Dick Rollema" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Pseudo stereo Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:55:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: To All from PA0SE Aldo, IZ1ANT, wrote: Dear Alan, if I understand well,you are receiving CW by ear, not by Spectrogram. For receiving CW by ears I found very useful a stereo processor, like that described in http://hem2.passagen.se/sm0vpo/use/stereo.htm which allow to "spatially" spread signals (and noise) " in front of you": lower frequency signals are stronger in the left earphone speaker, and higher frequency in the right one. In this way you can simply concentrate your brain in the signal coming from a certain "virtual direction" It's interesting with large filters (e.g. 500 Hz), however I never tryied it with narrower filters. It may need some adjustment... 73 Aldo IZ1ANT I have made such a gadget myself with a "centre frequency" of 900 Hz. It indeed produces a surround effect effect which at first sounds very surprising and promising. But careful and repeated evaluation showed it contributed absolutely nothing to the readibility of a weak signal in noise. Wide or narrow band filtering preceding the pseudo-stereo unit made no difference. I get the best result with my home made passive 35 Hz wide audio bandpass filter (four tuned circuits with coils in pot cores) between the output of the receiver and the headphones. It is a phase-linear design and therefore does not ring. Speeds up to 24 WPM are passed by the filter, but before that my ear/brain system starts ringing.... Butterworth, Chebychev and Cauer (elliptic) filters are not phase-linear and do do ring, though they have a steeper transition between pass- and stopbands. 73, Dick, PA0SE