Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11738 invoked from network); 17 Sep 1999 14:24:20 +0100 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 17 Sep 1999 14:24:20 +0100 Received: (qmail 1169 invoked from network); 17 Sep 1999 13:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 Sep 1999 13:28:36 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Rxjt-0008JY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:07:45 +0100 Received: from mail2.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.210]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Rxjr-0008JT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:07:43 +0100 Received: from modem-6.zoloft.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.95.6] helo=default) by mail2.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 11Rxjo-00087X-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:07:41 +0100 From: "Des Kostryca" To: "RSGB LF_Group" Subject: LF: Re:Antenna advice. Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:11:28 -0700 Message-ID: <000001bf0151$35d20bc0$065f883e@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Everyone, Firstly, thankyou to all who responded to my request for antenna advice. The response was very pleasing and very helpful. Geri (DK8KW) wrote... >If you have >access to the internet, have a look at >http://www.dk8kw.home.pages.de, >where I show my set-up and a drawing of a >commercial umbrella antenna from >the past. >The characteristics of that umbrella is, that the top >load is not >necessarily horizontal but the top load radials can >slope down at an angle >of 45 degrees or even steeper. This approach appeals to me as it is simple to implement though due to lack of space my umbrella spokes would be at quite a steep angle and would therefore have to be short. By the way Geri, I liked the cartoons :-) Dave Sergent (G3YMC) wrote... >Good luck with your work on LF and I hope we can >manage a QSO before long. As you may know I use >a loop transmitting antenna on 136 with reasonable >results Thanks Dave, I had a look at your web pages (very interesting) and when my vertical (utility) antenna is up and running I may also give the transmitting loop a try providing I can get hold of some "heavy" cabling in long enough lengths. Steve (GW4ALG) wrote... >I have little doubt about being able to hear your 35 >W to the 10 m vertical. In >addition to weekends, I can get on most weekday >mornings up to 08:45am local >time. That would be great Steve as I am often working on or around the weekend but have plenty of spare time in the week. I will let you know when I am "up and running" and perhaps we can arrange a "sked". Thanks also to Mike Dennison (G3XDV), Bob (ZL2CA) and Rik (ON7YD) for additional comments, most welcome. With all the feedback I now have a clear idea of what to aim for. The current plan is to add turns to my partially constructed loading coil and try the 10 mtr vertical with small "umbrella". Then I will move on to the 10 mtr vertical plus 3 horizontal wires which most seem to agree is the best option. I am currently at the "drilling holes in a plastic dustbin" stage. The only thing stopping me now is the wx, a shortage of patch leads and a "wasps nest" in the loft which means I am unable to retrieve some of my components :-( Still, very close to testing now. Thanks again to all those who took the time to respond and I will keep you all posted on my progress. Look forward to working many of you "on-band" soon. 73's all and good DX, Des. Des Kostryca (M0AYF) G.Q.R.P. no. 9788 I.A.R.U. loc. IO93OJ W.A.B. SK89 Member of the N.B.T.V.A.