Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3830 invoked from network); 9 Aug 1999 14:16:30 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 9 Aug 1999 14:16:30 +0100 Received: (qmail 10095 invoked from network); 9 Aug 1999 13:19:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 9 Aug 1999 13:19:58 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Dp62-0004Vs-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:04:10 +0100 Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net ([195.102.240.33]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Dp61-0004Vn-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:04:09 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from rsgb.u-net.com ([195.102.80.225] helo=rsgb.org.uk) by mserv1c.u-net.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #34) id 11Dpzj-0006iO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:01:44 +0000 Received: from miked.rsgbhq by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP5.R) for ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:00:27 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Radio Society of Great Britain To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:03:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: 73kHz skeds? In-reply-to: <37AE69E3.6DC7E49E@phonakcom.ch> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Message-ID: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: > how about a cross band QSO 73/136 in Slow CW. > > 73 de Toni, HB9ASB > Ho Toni. I would love to, but I think we have a better chance later in the year for the following reasons: 1) I have been plotting the signal from HBG using ON5OO's excellent software, and it confirms what I had from casual observation. That is an 8-10dB enhancement when the path is in darkness. I will post some of these shortly on my web site. At present, either we must get up very early or battle with QRN at night. 2) There are several improvements to be made to my antenna system which will give me a greater effective height and bigger capacitance hat. Both of these will have a greater effect on 73 than 136. 3) My 73kHz erp at present is around 23mW, compared to about 140mW on 136 so we will need all the help we can get. Suggest we take another look at a sked around late September. By the way, I will be doing some serious 73kHz work from west Wales in October, hoping to beat the two-way record which is about 180km at present. I expect to have a really stable oscillator (wow!) and will be able to send QRSs from a portable site in GW. A one-way to you, or a two-way cross-band would really be one for the record books at 1000km+, and very difficult to beat in the few months we still have the band (ends in June 2000). I have heard you on 136 from GW so that bit is easy!!! By the way, I failed to get my report last time we worked on 136kHz normal CW so would appreciate a call next time you hear me. 73 Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm