Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6955 invoked from network); 25 Aug 1999 06:19:02 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 25 Aug 1999 06:19:02 +0100 Received: (qmail 19103 invoked from network); 25 Aug 1999 05:17:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 25 Aug 1999 05:17:31 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11JV9e-0002Ww-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 05:59:22 +0100 Received: from mb06.swip.net ([193.12.122.210]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11JV9c-0002Wr-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 05:59:21 +0100 Received: from win95 (d212-151-32-25.swipnet.se [212.151.32.25]) by mb06.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA28252 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 06:59:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <001701beeeb6$ea512e80$192097d4@win95.swipnet.se> From: "Christer Andersson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: SV: Multiple Tuned Vertical Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:01:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Thanks for the interest in this issue. Steve Olney wrote: > We tend to >concentrate on radiation resistance alone, when it is the ratio of >radiation resistance to losses which determines how much goes into ether >and how much warms up the local environment. In an article in the Swedish magazine QTC mr Dagaas, chief engineer at SAQ, briefly explains the working principle of the MTA: A single vertical with top loading and earth system would have a feed impedans of approx. 2,5 ohm. If six such antennas are parallelled, the total loss resistance becomes 1/6 while the radiation resistance remains unchanged. The total impedance is now 0,45 ohm due to reduced losses. The antenna input power is fed by 1/6 of the total current (feed impedance is raised by a factor 36). By varying the current distribution between the verticals (by changing the tuning coils) a suitable feed impedance can be achieved. 20 ohm in the SAQ case. It seems like the ratio of Rrad/Rloss is increased. Corresponding thougths can be found in the ARRL Antenna book edition 17 p4-21. In parallell with this discussion on the LF reflector, the subject has been treated in the news group rec.amateur.radio.antenna. /Christer