Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5243 invoked from network); 16 Aug 1999 23:24:24 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 16 Aug 1999 23:24:25 +0100 Received: (qmail 13613 invoked from network); 16 Aug 1999 20:40:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 16 Aug 1999 20:40:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11GT2z-000035-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:07:57 +0100 Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.48]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11GT2x-000030-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:07:56 +0100 Received: from v3q4v1 (dc2-isdn865.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.151.97]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA29093 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:07:54 +0200 (CEST) From: "M. Sanders" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Solar Flare on LF... Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:05:07 +0200 Message-ID: <000001bee822$a33f0160$61976dc2@v3q4v1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <37B833BF.15126C1C@nephro.uni-kiel.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp1.xs4all.nl id WAA29093 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Hi All This effect is als known as the Moegel-Dellinger effekt or SWF (Shorwave Fade Out). A German language description can be found in the Rothammels Antennen Buch chapter 2.3.2.2. Ionosphaerenstoerungen. This text confirms the effect as a D-layer disturbance caused by solar flares. The intense radiation increases the ionisation in the D layer. The HF radio signals do not reach the E or F layers due to increased absorption (fade-out). The LF signals increase as they reflect better against the bottom of the D-layer when the refraction index (ionisation density) increases. The same physics apply to LF/HF as to visible light. Chaos theory and the behavour of other gasses (water-vapour, ozone etc) in the earth atmosphere make it hard form me to beleive the D or E layers are homogeneous. This may account for 'local' observations, measurement variations as well as different effects at different observation distances. Short distances observe mainly groundwave effects and there is a minimum distance for the 'first-skip' from refelction against the D layer. The minimum skip distance is a measure for the hight of the D layer and the refraction index. There is a poor reflection at a high angle. Looking at the data collected during the eclipse on the internet pages gives food for thought! May be there have been made recordings of some more 'anomalities'? I have received HBG75 eclipse measurement data from other amateurs. Will put some combined graphs and an analysis on my homepage soon and ask for comments via the reflector. Does anyone have information about the temperature effect from an ecliipse observed in the ionosphere between 50km and 150km hight? 73's Michael Sanders, PA3BSH mailto:pa3bsh@amsat.org > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: majordom@post.thorcom.com [mailto:majordom@post.thorcom.com]namens > Peter W. Schnoor > Verzonden: maandag 16 augustus 1999 17:53 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: Solar Flare on LF... > > > Hello Group, > > Recording HBG75 (75 kHz) over the whole last week I found a > strong anomaly at Saturday, 14th. I observed a steep > increase of field strength (9dB) followed by a smooth > decrease looking like a typical exponential function. > Looking to sites offering geomagnetic data I could not > explain it. So my first assumption was that it could have > been an artefact. > > Expanding the graph to higher zoom level showed the typical > weak 60sec. rhythm of HBG due to my short integration time > in front of the A/D-Convertor (time constant 2.6sec.). So > I'm sure that it was the signal of HBG and not any kind of > noise source. > > J.J.Delcourt from RMI gave the explanation: It was the > influence of a Solar Flare on LF propagation. (Thank you!) I > never observed this before... > > A plot of this event can be found there: > ftp://ftp.rz.uni-kiel.de/pub/nephro/nephlab/lp/solarflare.gif > > 54°16'N / 10°04'E, JO54ag > 73 es gl de Peter, DF3LP > >