Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1448 invoked from network); 28 Jul 1999 01:52:09 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 28 Jul 1999 01:52:09 +0100 Received: (qmail 9204 invoked from network); 27 Jul 1999 23:31:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 27 Jul 1999 23:31:50 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 119GY9-0005CG-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:22:21 +0100 X-Priority: 3 Received: from mailout04.btx.dtag.de ([194.25.2.152]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 119GY8-0005C6-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:22:20 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from fwd08.btx.dtag.de ([194.25.2.168]) by mailout04.btx.dtag.de with smtp id 119GY6-0008Oz-00; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:22:18 +0200 Received: (087321565-0001(btxid)@[193.158.171.64]) by fwd08.btx.dtag.de id ; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:22:09 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:22:09 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3.0.1.16.19990726095047.2eff9c40@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> <379CBAFF.652B@xtra.co.nz> <379CE90B.350F600A@netins.net> Subject: Re: LF: Ground systems X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sender: 087321565-0001@t-online.de From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Doc Gruis schrieb: > This following episode was told to me by an old time BC engineer about > an early station located in the state of South Dakota. > > It was not at all unusual for stations, studios, anyhow, to be located > on the top floor of some building. It was not so common for the > transmitter to be there as well. But in this case, that is where the > transmitter was indeed situated, perched proudly above the highest > prominence on the roof of this particular hotel. > > The testing of the station went very well. It was in the middle of the > night. > > But on the day of the official sign-on, and there were several > dignitaries there, it was impossible to keep the station on the air > because it was impossible to keep the antenna tower in tune. > > It had been mounted on the top of the elevator (hoist) shaft! And as > the greeting crowd and other business started for the day the elevator > acted like a very large tuning slug! This reminds me of a problem I had encountered when still living in Munich, with much restricted space for antennas. For all HF bands I just had a 21 meters end-fed wire available, with a wire counterpoise in the loft, also connected to the house ground and the TV antenna mast. On 160 meters I had to employ base loading, but I wondered that the VSWR often was higher than normal, until I discovered that optimum VSWR depended on how many apparatus I had connected to the mains in my shack (which had been just below the loft), thus varying the number of radials for 160 meters! To cure this problem, I had to insulate the counterpoise from the house ground and TV-mast for RF, using a big toroid choke, and to feed the antenna for 160 meters via a 1:1 separation transformer. Now the 160 meter antenna may have looked like an asymmetrical dipole, but the tuned section had to use the insulated counterpoise only as the other antenna end. Tuning of the antenna now had been entirely different from the previous setup, but the mains wires remained neutral. /3 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB