Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15332 invoked from network); 26 Jul 1999 08:36:39 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 26 Jul 1999 08:36:39 +0100 Received: (qmail 23689 invoked from network); 26 Jul 1999 07:39:15 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 26 Jul 1999 07:39:15 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 118fDF-0005FM-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:30:17 +0100 Received: from apollo.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.125]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 118fDE-0005FH-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:30:16 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from harrier.le.ac.uk ([143.210.8.56]) by apollo.le.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 118fDD-0007gV-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:30:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:31:49 +0100 (BST) From: "Kate Moore" X-Sender: mek@harrier To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Weekend report Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Stations worked here over the weekend on 136kHz using normal speed CW: Friday 23/7 GM3YXM/P (13.43UT: gave him 579, he gave me 579), EI0CF (18.05: 579, 569). Saturday 24/7 GM3YXM/P (06.59: 57/89, 57/89), PA0SE (07.10: 57/89, 57/89 [-83dBm]). Sunday 25/7 GM3YXM/P (08.00: 57/89, 579). I was fairly inactive again this weekend and when I was about, activity seemed very low. This was a pity 'cos Dave was back up in Southwest Scotland, putting out an excellent signal but having to work hard to get contacts. Static levels were lower than they have been recently, but I am suffering with some low-level buzz from what appears to be a SMPSU close by, so my background noise level varies quite a lot at the moment and I can't always hear the weakest DX. I found Finbar's beacon on Saturday evening just above 136.700kHz at around S4/5, and it was still audible above the SMPSU early Sunday norning. Apparently this was running QRP with about 1A antenna current. Later when he moved it to around 136.165kHz it came up to a nice S6. I was very interested in the comments from Bob ZL2CA last weekend about horizontal antennas on LF. Probably the most successful DXer on 136kHz (especially when you take into account TX power) is Reino OH1TN, and as most of you will know, he uses a very long and predominantly horizontal wire (although it is reasonably high too). As I have now been heard in HS6.... (!! - no, it WASN'T me who put that spot on the cluster, but I will gladly QSL...) Seriously though, I have always used mostly horizontal wires on 73 and 136kHz and my earliest configuration had almost no vertical component, despite a number of people at that time suggesting it wouldn't work. It's interesting that I was using this when I was the first person outside the Baltic area to receive Reino, back in December '97. The DX QSOs I've been making with my present antenna (which is still quite low and mostly horizontal) show that even relatively short horizontal antennas do work well on LF. In addition, I've noticed that my receive signal to noise ratio often seems better than that of stations using big vertical antennas, although there could be other reasons for this. Traditionally, the horizontal sections of LF antennas have been considered a necessary evil to provide loading, but I feel that, especially for amateur work, horizontal antennas can provide extremely good results in their own right. Regards John G4GVC near Leicester, IO92JP ** TX: Synth + 400W RF from modified 'G3YXM' Mosfet PA ** ** RX: TS-850S with 3 x CW filters and 0.5ppm TCXO ** ** Ant: Inv-L 60m long, 6m high at feed end, 12m high at far end **