Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12674 invoked from network); 6 Jul 1999 10:00:00 +0100 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 1999 10:00:00 +0100 Received: (qmail 5944 invoked from network); 6 Jul 1999 09:01:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 6 Jul 1999 09:01:15 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 111Qdv-0006Zp-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:31:55 +0100 Received: from mserv1b.u-net.net ([195.102.240.137]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 111Qdp-0006Zf-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:31:50 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from rsgb.u-net.com ([195.102.80.225] helo=rsgb.org.uk) by mserv1b.u-net.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #61) id 111Qck-0003Jy-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:30:43 +0100 Received: from miked.rsgbhq [192.168.2.30] by rsgb.org.uk [192.168.2.132] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP5.R) for ; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:23:57 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Radio Society of Great Britain To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:25:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: Spectrogram X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Message-ID: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Having been initially enthusiastic about the latest version of Spectrogram, I have tried it on several real signals (only tested it on weak carriers before) and I have now gone back to the previous version. The ability to define the colours/shades that relate to signal strength is good but some of the other controls appear to allow much less flexibility. Has anyone found the best settings yet? The main idiot trap is the averaging control which must be set =much= lower than on the earlier version (for 4s dots, it needs to be about 4 rather than 20) or it will ignore dots and fill in the gaps between dashes. And there seems to be no easy way to adjust the width of the displayed dots/dashes without altering the bandwidth. Am I doing something wrong? Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm