Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1414 invoked from network); 23 Jul 1999 13:57:44 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 1999 13:57:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 13347 invoked from network); 23 Jul 1999 13:00:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 23 Jul 1999 13:00:07 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 117ehL-00051s-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:45:11 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from ah-img-1.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.154] helo=hpamgaaa.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 117ehJ-00051k-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:45:10 +0100 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by hpamgaaa.compuserve.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/HP-1.5) id IAB15796 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 08:45:02 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 08:42:59 -0400 From: "Dave Sergeant" Subject: LF: S-meters and DCF39 - correction To: "rsgb_lf_group" Message-ID: <199907230843_MC2-7E05-2CA7@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: >From Dave G3YMC Below is a corrected version of the mail I sent earlier. My signal generator is calibrated in dB of attenuation relative to +13dBm, and I had incorrectly converted my figures into dBm. The new figures are more reasonable, and show how easy it is to get confused when dealing with dBm (even from someone who should know better!). The new figures are rather more realistic, but still indicate that we should not rely on S-meters for quantitative measurements. *************************************************************************** **** I have calibrated my receive set up against a quality signal generator, calibrated in dBm into 50 ohms. I won't bore you with the actual figures, but they show that the use of S meter figures is totally meaningless. The s-meter for my FT101ZD is designed to measure the signal at its own receiver input - this is meaningless when there is a receive converter at the front end with its own gain, which in my case is appreciable. I also do not know the input impedance of my receiver - the figures are for a nominal 50ohms but would be double for an infinite input impedance. The important figures are: DCF39 (875km) 45uV into 50 ohms (-74dBm) Noise level (typical) 1.2uV into 50 ohms (-105dBm) S9 4.5uV 1 S point is typically around 2dB, although surprisingly S9 to S9+10 measures as 10dB. point taken, S meters are meaningless. Unlike some I get very little variation in the strength of DCF39 - it is always S9+18 on my meter with a variation of no more than 1dB or so. I never ever see the 20 to 30 dB variations some mention. Reception is normally on my transmit loop. Thanks to Geri DK8KW for his dB conversion chart. However I would request that he changes the colours on his page. White text on a black background looks fine on a monitor, but most of us would like to print it out. I had to edit the page before printing so that I could see the white ink on my white paper.... 73s Dave G3YMC sergeantd@compuserve.com