Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75 invoked from network); 10 Jul 1999 11:23:51 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 10 Jul 1999 11:23:51 +0100 Received: (qmail 15248 invoked from network); 10 Jul 1999 10:25:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 10 Jul 1999 10:25:06 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 112uAg-0004iR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:15:50 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from ah-img-2.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.153] helo=hpamgaab.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 112uAf-0004iM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:15:49 +0100 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by hpamgaab.compuserve.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/HP-1.5) id GAA25451 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 06:15:18 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 06:12:24 -0400 From: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" Subject: LF: Bandplanning: QRS frequencies .... To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <199907100612_MC2-7C82-CEE2@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: John, I am answering your request to suggest a band plan for our small longwave band throught the reflector, since I believe that a discussion would help to come to an agreement. I read about the recommendation and the LORAN free window around 136.458 kHz but I have never seen a Slow-CW QSO down there. I do observe the band since two or three years now and found that indeed, main Slow-CW activity can be found around 137.700 kHz. Depending upon the setting of Spectrogram, the complete range between 137.650 and 137.750 can be observed at one glance. I believe that a second Slow-CW window would cause confusion. Additionally, also in that upper window there are some nice LORAN-free spots. I have made a list of LORAN frequencies that should be avoided when seeking contact with stations near a coast, where LORAN is to strong (http://www.dk8kw.home.page.de). Also on my homepage I have published a kind of "bandplan" that is based upon my own observations, of course from the persepective of Northern Germany. I propose to set up a voluntary band plans as follows: 135.700 - 136.000 kHz Testing frequencies, such as short-term beacon transmissions, for example for field strength measurements, or for local QSOs. This range seems to be difficult to use for QSOs since there is obviously a lot of QRM. So this range might be good to set up short-term test beacon transmissions to test antennas, measuring field strength, QSOs with very local character, etc. without disturbing other QSOs on the band. 136.000 - 137.000 kHz normal CW, with center of activity at 136.500, additionally possibly a "cross-band frequency" might be established, such as 136.900 kHz for people seeking answer on a different band. 137.000 - 137.300 kHz PSK31, with 137.150 being the main operating frequency (analog to the shortwave PSK31 frequencies 1838.150, 3580.150, 7035.150, 10140.150, etc.) and RTTY. 137.300 - 137.600 kHz for future use 137.600 - 137.800 Slow-CW, with 137.700 as main center of activity and "calling frequency" Please feel free to discuss my proposal. Best regards Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)