Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8570 invoked from network); 26 Jul 1999 07:11:55 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 26 Jul 1999 07:11:55 +0100 Received: (qmail 11291 invoked from network); 26 Jul 1999 06:14:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 26 Jul 1999 06:14:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 118dfl-0004ZY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 06:51:37 +0100 Received: from mail5.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.20]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 118dfk-0004ZT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 06:51:36 +0100 Received: from modem-74.dextroamphetam.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.62.202] helo=default) by mail5.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 118dfh-0006h2-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 06:51:34 +0100 Message-ID: <000001bed72b$00753740$ca3e883e@default> From: "wireless" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000901becd8c$0f99b640$e8daac3e@default> <379B1A4A.6ABAC693@cableol.co.uk> Subject: LF: Spectrogram 5 vs 426 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 06:50:29 +0100 Organization: T@ylor Training MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: My own observations showed that a weak signal seemed to show up better on 426 than 5, although I could well have not learned how to drive the latter. However that was version 5.01. I see from the web page for Spectrogram that there is now a v. 5.08. Has anyone tried this? John Taylor G0AKN earth@wireless.freeserve.co.uk