Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29623 invoked from network); 1 Jun 1999 10:45:56 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 1 Jun 1999 10:45:56 +0100 Received: (qmail 10210 invoked from network); 1 Jun 1999 09:49:53 -0000 Received: from punt.unica.co.uk (194.75.183.60) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 1 Jun 1999 09:49:53 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by punt.unica.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.00 #2) id 10ol7P-0001lT-00; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:45:59 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA02614 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:46:00 GMT X-Priority: 3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA02610 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:45:58 GMT X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from ursa.cns.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.210.1]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10olLp-0001QX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 11:00:53 +0100 Received: from fs5.ee.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.118.127]) by ursa.cns.umist.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2) for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org id 10ol76-0004sC-00; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:45:40 +0100 Received: from UK-AC-UMIST-EE-FS5/SpoolDir by fs5.ee.umist.ac.uk (Mercury 1.44); 1 Jun 99 10:45:39 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from SpoolDir by UK-AC-UMIST-EE-FS5 (Mercury 1.43); 1 Jun 99 10:45:23 GMT From: "Keith" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:45:19 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: lf: DX Cluster spots Priority: normal In-reply-to: <000001beaaf0$37ff3e20$f0238cd4@default> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54) Message-ID: Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Hello Alan and the LF group, I have been involved with cluster networks for some years and late last year opening my own cluster node, gb7dxx. I also follow LF progress although I don't presently have time to do anything more practical. Alan wrote: > It seems that the original cluster software will not accept spots entered below 1800KHz, though some of the newer >software clones are more flexible. True of AK1A software. I run software developed in France, dos based, and I believe can be adapted but how does the next node cope with the spot? There are two Linux based cluster node software code also expanding in features and I will pass along your comments. The cluster network is not permanently linked across the whole of the Uk thus at times difference in information available. Regards, Keith, G3RTU/GB7DXX