Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14761 invoked from network); 16 Jun 1999 22:31:51 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 1999 22:31:51 +0100 Received: (qmail 19528 invoked from network); 16 Jun 1999 19:50:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (194.75.130.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 16 Jun 1999 19:50:34 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10u14R-00043u-00; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:48:39 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id VAA18938 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:47:58 GMT Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA18934 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:47:55 GMT Received: from merlins.force9.net ([195.166.128.23]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10u132-00043f-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:47:13 +0100 Received: (qmail 1212 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1999 21:51:38 -0000 Received: from mayfly.plus.net.uk (HELO mayfly.force9.net) (195.166.128.28) by merlins.force9.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 1999 21:51:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 17945 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1999 21:17:52 -0000 Received: from 414.hiper01.shef.dialup.force9.net (HELO prstesv1) (195.166.143.158) by mayfly.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 15 Jun 1999 21:17:52 -0000 Message-ID: <003201beb774$0d00d400$0600a8c0@prstesv1.prestel.co.uk> From: "Dave" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Noise - latest Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:14:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Nick / John, I can rule out BT's "DAX" box which uses analogue carrier multiplex as I had one here for a while with no RF problems on any band. It was USELESS for use with a modem though so it's gone now! 73, Dave G3YXM (again) >On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:12:16 +0100, you wrote: > >>To briefly answer a few points which were raised: >>Yes, the poles where the noise peaked are definately telephone poles and >>NOT power-line poles > > >Just a wild idea. > >Have any of your neighbours had 'home highway' (the domestic brand of ISDN >installed). > >BT also have a wonderful little pair of boxes which duplexes two BT lines onto >one physical pair of cables. If someone near you has had one fitted depending on >the technology used this could increase the noise on the phone lines. > >Have you looked at the modulation on the noise in a reasonable bandwidth? if it >is 50Hz or harmonic related then it is something to do with distribution wiring >or appliances, if it is not mains synchronous then it is an appliance of some >sort. > >Good luck > >Back to lurk mode > >Nick >G4WHO >