Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14013 invoked from network); 14 Jun 1999 16:53:07 +0100 Received: from cask.force9.net (195.166.128.29) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 14 Jun 1999 16:53:08 +0100 Received: (qmail 14349 invoked from network); 14 Jun 1999 15:06:24 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by cask.force9.net with SMTP; 14 Jun 1999 15:06:24 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10tXar-0005TD-00; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:20:09 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA05780 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:19:36 GMT Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA05776 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:19:32 GMT Received: from apollo.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.125]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10tXZo-0005Sl-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:19:04 +0100 Received: from pc171.geog.le.ac.uk ([143.210.151.171] helo=kate) by apollo.le.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10tXZn-0006zc-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:19:03 +0100 Message-ID: <000a01beb66f$e86598b0$ab97d28f@kate.geog.le.ac.uk> From: "Kate Moore" To: "lfgroup" Subject: LF: Noise - latest Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:12:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Many thanks again to everyone who provided further suggestions and encouragement on the noise problem: N4ICK, EI0CF, ZL3FJ, VK3GJZ, G4TMV, G3YMC and GW4ALG. All comments are very much appreciated and useful in getting to the bottom of this - I am wondering whether there may be some mileage in compiling a collection of tips for tracking down noise on LF! The latest situation hasn't changed much as I have been very busy again this week, so have had little time to go out DFing. The noise is still running continuously at S9 on 136kHz, but I did hear Dave G3YXM above it on Saturday afternoon. Having checked with Dave that my TX frequency was clear, we had a contact (my first on LF in 3 weeks!) which made a nice change, but the noise was quite noticable even with Dave's monster signal, so I didn't attempt to do anything else. I'm totally against using the band if you can't hear any of the weaker signals - that just causes problems for everyone else...... To briefly answer a few points which were raised: Yes, the poles where the noise peaked are definately telephone poles and NOT power-line poles. It is very uncommon to have overhead power lines in cities in England (although they are very common outside the cities). My locality is typical of an English city suburb with no overhead power lines at all (so I can't check them!) but LOTS of telephone poles. The local transformer happens to be right outside the telephone exchange, but as mentioned last time, the noise didn't show a peak anywhere in that immediate area, and I'm not climbing over the fence to get in really close! I happen to have a bat-detector, so if it is an arcing problem I am already equipped to 'hear' it - nice suggestion that, Alan and Dave! At Steve's suggestion, I used the Walkman to check for noise at our house consumer box. Yes, it is louder there, but so are all the BC signals. The noise is louder still where the central-heating pipes run up the wall and into the loft (attic), so I think this is all just a re-radiation effect. The most mystifying news is that the medium-wave noise appears to NOT be local to me. On foot, I observed it getting weaker, but in the car driving to work I discovered that it comes up again as you get further away and there appears to be a fixed 'standing-wave' effect of peaks and troughs in the noise. I could still hear it well on the car radio at work - 5 miles away in the centre of the city! Now I have to investigate whether I am confusing the issue by listening on medium wave - maybe that is a different source from my 136kHz problem? If not, it's one heck of a noise source..... More when I have it! John G4GVC near Leicester, IO92JP