Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6247 invoked from network); 25 May 1999 11:17:44 +0100 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 25 May 1999 11:17:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 27909 invoked from network); 25 May 1999 10:20:59 -0000 Received: from punt.unica.co.uk (194.75.183.60) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 25 May 1999 10:20:59 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by punt.unica.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.00 #2) id 10mEGC-00016E-00; Tue, 25 May 1999 11:16:36 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA12556 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Tue, 25 May 1999 10:16:41 GMT Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA12552 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 10:16:39 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net ([195.102.240.33]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10mEUf-0003bq-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 May 1999 11:31:33 +0100 Received: from rsgb.u-net.com ([195.102.80.225] helo=rsgb.org.uk) by mserv1c.u-net.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #34) id 10mFBQ-0007Sh-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 May 1999 11:15:44 +0000 Received: from miked.rsgbhq [192.168.2.30] by rsgb.org.uk [192.168.2.132] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP3.R) for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 11:08:51 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Mike Dennison" Organization: Radio Society of Great Britain To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:09:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: Spectrogram dot length Priority: normal In-reply-to: <37499685.51BBFD17@nephro.uni-kiel.de> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > On the subject of QRSs, it may be useful to list a few abbreviations > > which are acceptable. For instance, DJ5BV did not send QRZ? to > > me, he just sent ?? which was clearly understood. A replacement > > for 73 would be useful - what about just TU (meaning 'thank you' for > > anyone who hasn't done HF CW recently)? > > I'm preferring CU (*SEE* YOU) since that's what has happened > or should be... > > 54°16'N / 10°04'E, JO54ag > 73 es gl de Peter, DF3LP > Yes, of course. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm