Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29786 invoked from network); 26 Apr 1999 11:01:38 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 26 Apr 1999 11:01:38 +0100 Received: (qmail 5769 invoked from network); 26 Apr 1999 10:02:33 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 26 Apr 1999 10:02:33 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10bi8i-0004A1-01; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:57:24 +0100 X-Priority: 3 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA13076 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 09:57:32 GMT X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA13072 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 09:57:30 GMT Received: from mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.8.44]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10bi8Y-00049y-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:57:15 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA19159 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 12:01:53 +0200 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.19990426105512.08575f54@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:55:12 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: LF: RX measurements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Last week I did some RX measurements on my receiver and antenna : 1. The sensitivity of my receiver (Kenwood TS440 - 500Hz CW filter) on 136kHz is 0.5µV (-113dBm) for 10dB S/N. As signal source I used a Rohde&Schwarz SMS2. Assuming that an 'exercised ear' easily can read a 0dB S/N CW signal this means that signals down to -123dBm could be read (if no QRM/QRN) 2. Using a Rohde&Schwarz URV3 millivoltmeter (10kHz-2GHz) I measured the antenna-voltage. There was almost no difference between the voltage with a 50 Ohm load and the RX input as load, so the RX input is close to 50 Ohm. With the antenna (13m high and 26m long inverted-L tuned to 136kHz) directly to the receiver input the voltage measured was almost constant at 35mV during daytime but was going up and down between 50mV and 200mV during the night. Insering a low-pass filter (-3dB at 170kHz) between antenna and RX reduced the voltage to 30mV during daytime and 30 to 120mV at night. Conclusions : - When using a 136kHz transmit antenna for receiving (without additional filtering the signal at the RX input is in the range of 35 to 200mV (-16 to -1dBm) and will cause severe intermodulation to most receivers, especially at night. - Adding a low-pass filter doesn't change the antenna-voltage during daytime (only -1.3dB) and reduces the antenna-voltage only minimal (-4.5dB) at night. This means that most of the sources that cause this high antenna-voltage are below 200kHz. - The measurements of PA0SE (results distributed to the list last week) indicate that most 136kHz ham signals are in the range of -75 to -95dBm. This is 28 to 48 dB above the 0dB S/N level of my RX. This means that a 20dB (or even 30dB) attenuator can be put between antenna and RX without loosing any sensitivity. Adding the attenuator however will increase the IM-behavior of the receiver by 40dB (for 20dB attenuation) or even 60dB (for 30dB attenuation). Although a broadband 'ohmic attenuator' already will bring a major improvement, a 'selective' attenuator made by a series of loose-coulped high-Q band-pass filters will be even better provided the correct ferrite material is used to prevent bad IM behavior of the filter itself. 73, Rik Rik Strobbe ON7YD rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be Villadreef 14 B-3128 Baal BELGIUM (JO20IX)