Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15831 invoked from network); 11 Mar 1999 20:19:35 -0000 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by medusa.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 11 Mar 1999 20:19:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 25440 invoked from network); 11 Mar 1999 20:22:09 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 11 Mar 1999 20:22:09 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10LBwf-0001wR-01; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:20:41 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA05854 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:17:24 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA05577 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:57:06 GMT Received: from yo2kjo.sorostm.ro ([193.226.98.28] helo=yo2kjo.ampr.org) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10LBcg-0007rO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:00:11 +0000 X-BBS-Msg-Type: P Date: Thu, 11 Mar 99 19:56:04 +0000 Message-ID: <26498@yo2kjo.ampr.org> From: yo2is@yo2kjo.ampr.org To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Ground systems ?... Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit From: YO2IS Hello, am still awaiting the raise of activity in my neighbourhoud, got receiving reports on my signal but not yet two way contacts. Always a lot of questions remain unaswered, it seems that everyone is solving the VLF in his own manner, its similar to things hapen in the EME community from where the TMO reporting system is comming !. With my actual HM equipment and PC the QRS type communication is still far way from me. Have lately seen very incouraging info's regarding VLF antennas built on small surfaces, there was no mention about the ground systems. Was reading in a very old book about VLF antennas and the Braun's grounding praxis. To day have read a message from IK5ZPV describing his impresive ground sys. Do use myself the "ground" ofered by the urban heating network, sure its may be OK but not ideal, the RF curent measured in aerial and in the ground wire are more or less the same. Our backyard is only 12 x 8 m, good soil conductivity, will a small ground system improve the antenna eficiency over the actual "ground" ?. Would like to know, just for comparaison, what's the antenna curent for a VLF tx claimed for 25W output ? (about 75W input, class B). Thanks in advance for informations, 73 & DX, Szigy.