Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23492 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 19:50:12 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 19:50:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 26288 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 18:50:32 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 18:50:32 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10S3Xp-00089t-01; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:47:25 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA03977 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:47:53 GMT Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA03850 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:29:01 GMT Received: from cask.force9.net ([195.166.128.29]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10S3FR-0007uN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:28:25 +0100 Received: (qmail 15042 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 18:25:23 -0000 Received: from relay3.force9.net (HELO relay2.force9.net) (195.166.128.25) by cask.force9.net with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 18:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 26292 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 18:21:28 -0000 Received: from 304.hiper02.shef.dialup.force9.net (HELO prstesv1) (195.166.145.48) by relay3.force9.net with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 18:21:28 -0000 Message-ID: <003001be7adb$0e69e500$0600a8c0@prstesv1.prestel.co.uk> From: "Dave" To: "LF Group" Subject: LF: Re: Isle of Man/cfa antenna Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:26:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Surely "all fools day" is on Thursday? >This group intends to use a crossed field antenna which not only >significantly reduces the visual intrusion of the transmitting aerial >(approx. 25 to 30 metres high as opposed to 260 metres for a conventional >mast) but is also intrinsically safer as regards the effects of the >induction field. I understand they're going to stuff half a megawatt into this thing! Most instructive..... as professor Brainstawm would say. Dave, G3YXM.