Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25289 invoked from network); 22 Feb 1999 09:51:05 -0000 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by medusa.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 22 Feb 1999 09:51:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 19141 invoked from network); 22 Feb 1999 09:51:58 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 22 Feb 1999 09:51:58 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10Es37-0007US-00; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:53:13 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA11442 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:49:34 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA11361 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:48:51 GMT Received: from mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.8.44]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10Eqjr-0006Qo-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 08:29:16 +0000 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA17435 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:29:31 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.19990222092454.2f0f994a@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:24:54 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Re LF Xtal/mixer Exciters/Synthesizer In-reply-to: <199902191301_MC2-6B20-3B7D@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org At 13:01 19/02/99 -0500, you wrote: >Hallo Lowfers, > >Peter, G3LDO mentioned his difficulties to build a reliable and stabile >exciter for LF and describes the solution developed by DJ1ZB. > >I myself also had my difficulties to build a solution from scratch. After >experimenting with 5-6 MHz VFOs and frequency dividers, I came accross a >nice synthesizer kit. With a frequency range between 1 Hz (!) and 54 MHz >(!) it is a real overkill for the LF band, but the features contained in it >are excellent for what we are doing. The resolution is 1 Hz, the accuracy, >once calibrated is in the same range and long time stability is excellent > When I started on 136 I just used a simple VFO on 8.6-8.9MHz, divided that by 64 and got a nice and stable 136kHz signal. Although it had a +/- 5Hz shortterm and a +/- 50Hz longterm drif it was perfect suitable for normal CW. When starting with slow CW this drift was not tolerable and I decided to built a PLL VFO. I checked out for some special PLL IC's but either they were hard to find or far to expensive, so I just took a handfull of ordinary CMOS IC's (CD4000 series) a constructed a simple PLL VFO on 8.6MHz in 64Hz steps. This signal was divided by 64 to get 136kHz in 1Hz steps. Total cost was about 1000BFR (25 Euro), half of it spent on thumbwheel switches. I ended up with 9 CMOS IC's (OK, you can do it with a single specialized IC but these CMOS are available in any electronics shop and alltogether cheaper than a PLL IC). Everything fits on a 6 by 9 cm piece of 'testboard'. I there is interest I will scan in the schematics and make it available. But do not expect something special it is just a 'textbook' PLL system. 73, Rik ON7YD Rik Strobbe ON7YD rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be Villadreef 14 B-3128 Baal BELGIUM (JO20IX)