Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14516 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2000 10:05:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 13 Apr 2000 10:05:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fgMM-0004FX-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:56:26 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.88]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12fgML-0004FR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:56:25 +0100 Received: from telemetry.demon.co.uk ([194.222.19.114]) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12fgM7-0004sU-0U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:56:12 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:46:43 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Tom Boucher" Subject: Re: LF: Coil winding conundrum In-reply-to: <38F4E429.1A94@xtra.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Version 3.03a Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Surely if the Litz coil Q was lower, it will run warmer? 73, Tom G3OLB In message <38F4E429.1A94@xtra.co.nz>, vernall writes >You did not report in your findings if the Litz wire coil ran cooler >than the single wire coil, but I am presuming it did. > >73, Bob ZL2CA > >