Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.133]) by air-md01.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMD014-8b774b6f2c7582; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:11:17 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 03A96380001C0;
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:11:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1NeEOK-00051l-72
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:10:04 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1NeEOJ-00051c-QQ
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:10:03 +0000
Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com ([209.85.218.224])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>)
id 1NeEOH-0004AV-Hj
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:10:03 +0000
Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so4311647bwz.29
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:09:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=m+I8BAcH/NSp8Ph9KvdTS88uJjDIujMMeqpMluNFqfw=;
b=F0NSx7CniXBAvFyPmR58qnWzenvpWzCJMFtAw7m+bt308QyIn2PQhcBc2E5jwJlQZc
E55PSKdT9kZESClN9CVm+wimgs2j6LXMMNKkKOiNT5zHI9w+uG02PHL0a2LF2er0cE64
Aj4BO1ffCMBQ3js58rTlN5c/6AAhQlnDhnQOE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=xSDLxdERgLLkWPR3N3jjcEMIXecP7nk+X+A0OjaEOdWhZ9AUoqAP84ahro4cYGoZGx
DUJlfRIKEIiX5XS3HxlCIV9aCCIJL1EXcKL2HjHNdscTgLNkaETJHt6uf4q6u4T+F8EQ
jWVG9/JBc/5GSSc2ghx26f4c2YeALQDQLMBQc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.151.216 with SMTP id d24mr417027bkw.1.1265576994428; Sun,
07 Feb 2010 13:09:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2886BF14DABA43E8A71B9BAD535C5847@JimPC>
References: <fc7eccec1002071020g1f1fe66dq4bd363e8d4142c39@mail.gmail.com>
<2886BF14DABA43E8A71B9BAD535C5847@JimPC>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:09:54 +0000
Message-ID: <fc7eccec1002071309j70cf7527ncdf577a0cd4e9cd9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
DomainKey-Status: good (testing)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR S/N Tests
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175dd9cc305911047f091b16
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40854b6f2c73358f
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
--0015175dd9cc305911047f091b16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Yes.
Odd that.
Increased spectrogram noise reading when it ought to be filtered out
I suspect the spectrogram is not a simple power level indication. SpecJT
appears to be more of a CFAR indication and the WSPR one may be
not-dissimilar in concept.
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
> Doing this also produces a lot of false decodes - the spectrogram display
> in WSPR shows a couple of broad, bright, noise-like bands where the
> passband-stopband transitions of the audio filter occur, with assorted
> spectral lines that are probably low-level noise from one PC or another. I
> have often noticed the number of false decodes goes up when there are
> narrow-
--0015175dd9cc305911047f091b16
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div>Yes. </div>
<div>Odd that.</div>
<div>Increased spectrogram noise reading when it ought to be filtered out<=
/div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>I suspect the spectrogram is not a simple=A0power level indication.=
=A0=A0 SpecJT appears to be more of a CFAR indication and the WSPR one may=
be not-dissimilar in concept.</div>
<div><br clear=3D"all">Andy<br><a href=3D"http://www.g4jnt.com">www.g4jnt.=
com</a><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">Doing this also produces a lot=
of false decodes - the spectrogram display in WSPR shows a couple of broa=
d, bright, noise-like bands where the passband-stopband transitions of the=
audio filter occur, with assorted spectral lines that are probably low-le=
vel noise from one PC or another. I have often noticed the number of false=
decodes goes up when there are narrow-</blockquote>
</div>
--0015175dd9cc305911047f091b16--