Return-Path: Received: from rly-da03.mx.aol.com (rly-da03.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.77]) by air-da03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDA032-a5c4b4b7121294; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:42:45 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-da03.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDA034-a5c4b4b7121294; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:42:43 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NUPCw-00054W-Ip for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:41:42 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NUPCw-00054N-1j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:41:42 +0000 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUPCt-0003Jk-LM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:41:42 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so3727435fgg.10 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:41:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lP8rY/Qf2FfLIJXKzmnkDNFEGwLM6ex7imYiRYDfcaE=; b=jFxtaJbvPhszB4WycaNQQLhINMsVgqH2V+KKbOhC4XObStQesmREGLjg/JYelMh+MN wU/ngSIZyWEfdK5qXJxhsG7dP1NMAD6N3LelOuhIDl0b0ikUDGq2P5rRwRL8ZfNr90ug jRUCLh3JJAn5LPTeQ2GOP9F9bclS1ih1Cz28k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Z4SwZTu84HQKnRAtccd22YvG8JT9zzKymbwcv94HbjQGdxAskYyHbQhn6pa7VjdiMO DM6cZbEVXDrFC/esPQ5XrERxK+vLQtgD4lOIZWi+lyU89lQJTr01SVytpThUYwz6fJEN b5qdprqeXsbh0cKQMqQXNVsBLP+lnmmiEC2GY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.187.82 with SMTP id k18mr1360319hbh.5.1263235298584; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:41:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:41:38 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: CW S/N abilities Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9f003d6786047ce7e372 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m229.1 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016363b9f003d6786047ce7e372 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Good.... Confirms exactly what I assumed. 5dB in 24Hz (which is about the same effective bandwidth of a good pair of ears) is -15dB S/N in 2500Hz Its interesting, too, that SSB is readable at far lower S/N ratios than might normally be expected. My SSB contesting ears, which have had practice mostly with AWGN on the microwave and VHF bands, but nothing like as good as the experienced ops, can read callsigns and reports - ie preformatted data - at a S/N in the SSB bandwidth of around -10 to -5dB. If we assume a S/N of +5dB is needed for incoherent detection, that suggests an effective aural bandwidth around 100 - 200Hz Considering the whole human evolutionary process has been geared to listening to voice -ike sounds, its not really surprising that we apply considerable adaptive filtering to the voice channel to get an efcective bandwidth so much lower than the actual band. So the human voice is a spread-spectrum system. Andy www.g4jnt.com 2010/1/11 Roelof Bakker > Hello Andy, > > The bandwidth of the SPM-30 was set to 24 Hz. > > 73, > Roelof > > --0016363b9f003d6786047ce7e372 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good....
Confirms exactly what I assumed.=A0=A0
5dB in 24Hz (which is=A0about the same effective bandwidth of a good= pair of ears)=A0=A0is -15dB S/N in 2500Hz
=A0
Its interesting, too, that SSB is readable at far lower S/N ratios th= an might normally be expected.=A0 My SSB contesting ears, which have had= practice mostly with AWGN on the microwave and VHF bands,=A0but nothing= like as good as the experienced ops, can read callsigns and reports - ie= preformatted data - at a S/N in the SSB bandwidth of around -10 to -5dB.= =A0=A0 If we assume a S/N of +5dB is needed for incoherent detection, that= suggests an effective aural bandwidth around 100 - 200Hz
=A0
Considering the whole human evolutionary process has been geared to= listening to voice -ike sounds, its not really surprising that we apply= considerable adaptive filtering to the voice channel to get an efcective= bandwidth so much lower than the actual band.=A0=A0=A0 So the human voice= is a spread-spectrum system.
=A0
2010/1/11 Roelof Bakker <<= a href=3D"mailto:roelof@ndb.demon.nl" target=3D"_blank">roelof@ndb.demon.n= l>
Hello Andy,

The bandwid= th of the SPM-30 was set to 24 Hz.

73,
R= oelof


--0016363b9f003d6786047ce7e372--