Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg04.mx.aol.com (rly-mg04.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.110]) by air-mg03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMG032-a0d4b2d0c3813c; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:24:22 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg04.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG047-a0d4b2d0c3813c; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:24:09 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NM2xM-0002Zx-I0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:19:04 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NM2xM-0002Zo-3P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:19:04 +0000 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NM31N-0005RX-1W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:23:15 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1810262fgg.10 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:23:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aD8EPfeKwZDZeKcS6sROgLKANfU+AshGuf9BQH+JT3Y=; b=FxPnfCBUde/0Wb5BeRGHH5qyxzTf/kSJBQJiwlaydDkY4AvZcTmdcyhQrbr64pMRzE XC2trI+0881PX7hP7DWjzK5izq0whgh18vrr7CGM+C4bdubGPv4hSFkaHuvo/oJp4xkR n5/vLhOBpG5NaYowBTY7fggBS8KqnNYbpO2nU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wrLoe9lrxTQNPrvK2P8r71Bz3xQgD0y0AhlrilgsD5Ocdn5ynLN4ug0SYmDv4+vyeX pVrRsPUumWdTU72tP09532xMerQRl16jpvkYgsmvXMWvZTLt/ktsHhXXYMmiSDAQmsAm 1j8cpxCszA1AMbGNP/5K6/Y5AjMoXXYSH+yD0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.139.89 with SMTP id s25mr497900hbs.113.1261243392437; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:23:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828ACB3@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <346854e9698cbf94f4483c66682bb63b.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:23:12 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d254.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Like the sound of that. How did you keep common mode interference induced on the power lead from getting anywhere near the high impedance antenna probe ? Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health and safety police 2009/12/19 Roelof Bakker : > Dear James, > >> I think the role of the ground with active whips is often neglected - the >> output of the whip preamp is the voltage differential between the whip >> element and the circuit ground, so the ground connection is just as much >> part of the antenna as the whip element itself is. Clearly, an electrically >> quiet ground is needed for the active whip, whether this is provided by the >> coax feeder or a seperate local ground connection. > > It seems that the requirements for a ground connection are quite relaxed. > I have tested a completely isolated system with the coax running horizontal > tied to a non conduction mast and shoved out of an upstairs window. Signal > strength received with the same system and the mast vertical mounted in the > garden to put the antenna at the same location in space, was within one dB > for a vertical polarised signal. > > I have also build a system with CAT5 cable as a balanced feeder. One twisted > pair was used for RF, the other for power feed. At both ends of the RF pair > rf-isolating transformers were used. This resulted in a very low local noise > pick up. > > Using a common mode choke at the antenna end does not change anything at all > either. My guess is that the antenna element is so small, that even a small > (capacitive) coupling is good ebnough for a ground. > > Best regards, > Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt > > >