DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=IAW2VO+7EmO4kAJbunfmx7mmtQUQaepAR3+raZVdZ9gGjjahkjDwK00Hg4OnBcumKU
         9MxsRgdWJLM9UMlz7RodMGg4EXb3eMPkHJh2hX0N+J+YfV2U18oG98OEkYialMvt/0DE
         7+UBY2HVGXVqoiB+xDg/zEp+w2/o2EPcwh5qU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AFDC7CD.5000409@sighthound.demon.co.uk>
References: <00df01ca6488$e9244a80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
	 <5MsXcPDG6Z$KFw8w@g4dmp.fsnet.co.uk>
	 <4AFDC7CD.5000409@sighthound.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:31:01 +0000
Message-ID: <fc7eccec0911131331w525f7811qdda4ee039e33a5e8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: PIRATES
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f0a018612fb80478476007
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--001485f0a018612fb80478476007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

My NoV specifically was not for manual CW.  So, technically, my beacon is
breaking the terms of the NoV by having an on-off 10 baud ident.

Andy
www.g4jnt.com

this email has been scanned for political correctness by the nanny state


2009/11/13 John P-G <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk>

> David Pratt wrote:
>
>
>> My NoV does not authorise me to operate a beacon so my operation is
>> limited to CW using proper Morse ;-)
>>
>
> I don't recall ever hearing this "proper morse" on the air, nor any reports
> of others having heard it.
>
> Perhaps more ERP or a more suitable mode is called for?
>
> Or is it a case of "if I /were/ to be active I would use proper morse, but
> to be honest it all seems like too much trouble"
>
> At least the WSPRers are doing something on the band, collecting their own
> experimental data and providing signals for others to study.
>
> A silent " proper Morse" signal is no use to anyone.
>
> Don't castigate those who are at least actively studying the band, in a
> variety of modulation schemes. How do you know what other peoples' NoV allow
> them to do - everyone applied for permission to carry out their own
> experiments and were granted these permissions on an individual basis. Not
> all of them are specifically for manual telegraphy.
>
>
>
> John
> GM4SLV
>
>

--001485f0a018612fb80478476007
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>My NoV specifically was not for manual CW.=A0 So, technically, my bea=
con is breaking the terms of the NoV by having an on-off 10 baud ident.</d=
iv>
<div><br clear=3D"all">Andy<br><a href=3D"http://www.g4jnt.com">www.g4jnt.=
com</a><br><br>this email has been scanned for political correctness by th=
e nanny state<br><br><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/11/13 John P-G <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk">gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk<=
/a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">David Pratt wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote"><br>My NoV does not authorise=
 me to operate a beacon so my operation is limited to CW using proper Mors=
e ;-)<br>
</blockquote><br>I don&#39;t recall ever hearing this &quot;proper morse&q=
uot; on the air, nor any reports of others having heard it.<br><br>Perhaps=
 more ERP or a more suitable mode is called for?<br><br>Or is it a case of=
 &quot;if I /were/ to be active I would use proper morse, but to be honest=
 it all seems like too much trouble&quot;<br>
<br>At least the WSPRers are doing something on the band, collecting their=
 own experimental data and providing signals for others to study.<br><br>A=
 silent &quot; proper Morse&quot; signal is no use to anyone.<br><br>Don&#=
39;t castigate those who are at least actively studying the band, in a var=
iety of modulation schemes. How do you know what other peoples&#39; NoV al=
low them to do - everyone applied for permission to carry out their own ex=
periments and were granted these permissions on an individual basis. Not=
 all of them are specifically for manual telegraphy.<br>
<br><br><br>John<br>GM4SLV<br><br></blockquote></div><br>

--001485f0a018612fb80478476007--