Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-db05.mx.aol.com (rly-db05.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.80]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDB042-ac34afd8a993d3; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:34:55 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db05.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB051-ac34afd8a993d3; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:34:34 -0500
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1N8z5W-0003oG-Uv
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:30 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1N8z5V-0003o7-GR
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000
Received: from mail-gx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.217.221])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>)
	id 1N8z5T-0007jZ-ME
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000
Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so3454964gxk.10
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:33:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=a5z/cfQEGwTEMgOuJJWiAKD5/ACUO7lkHKo3TKFUyzo=;
        b=nrhjqUio8DLcyeSoLH9uuO95YGAADW5GYk9UIWLHL6asyF71RDLTGfs5RaKGl/wV6D
         VDeKrosrb1vAWel+uNICOyUNA/5h5KQjcicCxX363KzdkNJVHAxRxcNhR7fdZnzLrZbR
         MmQYXLsqJYtfURtc/hrdxuMXDOVeH4YxnkeT0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=RsA7obrUBV6uKKT/hhEw1dgM/XBdoSaxCqEzTaeMK+qgPS9qYtuJtuQnaZgUPccugo
         P7oQ1jyQF/gj6PKL7P3AsgrNETtE+8KZii4Bp8IqESXYE4Wup4B75+9ovcC6Y1ivLJYS
         9XCQOGIH5X26DAheeiSvTTv9IeM8g/xVAuKuE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.150.79 with SMTP id m15mr481946hbb.32.1258130000701; Fri, 
	13 Nov 2009 08:33:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <961313.39040.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <B27E914A546A4D91A7A1D084A23B07AC@AGB>
	 <961313.39040.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:20 +0000
Message-ID: <fc7eccec0911130833r4947bcf9kb519c076ac7d9578@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Karma: unknown: 
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276
Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature 
	stations ??
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,
	HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m247.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)


--001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

And who do you think would bother if you did work one ?
Who would even care ?

Andy
www.g4jnt.com

this email has been scanned for political correctness by the nanny state


2009/11/13 M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>

>   The whole setup looks decidedly dodgy to me. If they are Pirates how
> would it affect my license if the opportunity arose for me to work one and I
> did? The only place I know where I am licensed work a non Amateur station is
> on 5megs and that can only be a UK Mill station.
>
> It's a question of how much you value your license I suppose.
>
> 73 petefmt
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 13/11/09, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature
> stations ??
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Date: Friday, 13 November, 2009, 14:53
>
> Scott
>
> SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot coexist at close range for more than a
> small fraction of a second because they collide with and annihilate each
> other, releasing large quantities of energy in the form of gamma rays
>
> Got it  now .. gamma rays are electromagnetic ..hence radio waves are
> produced .. which may suffer  (constructive interference) or (destructive
> interference) resulting in large variations in amplitude at the point of
> observation .....
>
> Thanks  !
>
> G ..
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net<http://uk.mc281.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sthed475@telus.net>
> >
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<http://uk.mc281.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> >
> Subject: Re: LF: Are the  new VE stations able to  qso  with  other amature
> stations ??
>
> >
> > Hi John
> >
> > VX is in developmental service (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur
> service... Like positive and negative antimatter they don't mix.
> >
> > 73 Scott
> >
> >
> > John P-G wrote:
> >> Scott Tilley wrote:
> >>> Hi Graham
> >>>
> >>> All Canadian 600m stations are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental
> Licenses and are not able to communicate with the Amateur Service.
> >>
> >> So VX9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs with EI0CF?
> >>
> >> Still confused....
> >>
> >> John
> >> GM4SLV
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

--001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>And who do you think would bother if you did work one ?</div>
<div>Who would even care ?</div>
<div><br clear=3D"all">Andy<br><a href=3D"http://www.g4jnt.com">www.g4jnt.=
com</a><br><br>this email has been scanned for political correctness by th=
e nanny state<br><br><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/11/13 M0FMT <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk">m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">
<table border=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign=3D"top">
<div><span>The whole setup looks=A0decidedly dodgy to me. If they are Pira=
tes how would it affect my license if the opportunity arose for me to work=
 one and I did? The only place I know where I am licensed work a non Amate=
ur station is on 5megs and that=A0can only be a UK Mill station.</span></d=
iv>

<div><span></span>=A0</div>
<div><span>It&#39;s a question of how much you value your license I suppos=
e.</span></div>
<div><span></span>=A0</div>
<div><span>73 petefmt</span></div>
<div><br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 13/11/09, Graham <i>&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:g8fz=
k@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk</a>&gt;</i>=
</b> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT:=
 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><br>From: Graham &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:g8fzk@g8fzk=
.fsnet.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk</a>&gt;<br>Subject=
: Re: <span><span>LF</span></span>: Are the new VE stations able to qso wi=
th other amature stations ??<br>
To: <a href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" target=3D"_blank">rsgb=
_lf_group@blacksheep.org</a><br>Date: Friday, 13 November, 2009, 14:53<br>=
<br>
<div>Scott<br><br>SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot coexist at close ran=
ge for more than a small fraction of a second because they collide with an=
d annihilate each other, releasing large quantities of energy in the form=
 of gamma rays<br>
<br>Got it=A0 now .. gamma rays are electromagnetic ..hence radio waves ar=
e produced .. which may suffer=A0 (constructive interference) or (destruct=
ive interference) resulting in large variations in amplitude at the point=
 of observation .....<br>
<br>Thanks=A0 !<br><br>G ..<br><br>---------------------------------------=
-----------<br>From: &quot;Scott Tilley&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"http://uk.mc2=
81.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dsthed475@telus.net" target=3D"_blank">st=
hed475@telus.net</a>&gt;<br>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM<br>To: &lt;<a href=3D"http://uk.mc=
281.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" target=3D=
"_blank">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org</a>&gt;<br>Subject: Re: LF: Are the=
=A0 new VE stations able to=A0 qso=A0 with=A0 other amature stations ??<br=
>
<br>&gt; <br>&gt; Hi John<br>&gt; <br>&gt; VX is in developmental service=
 (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur service... Like positive and ne=
gative antimatter they don&#39;t mix.<br>&gt; <br>&gt; 73 Scott<br>&gt; <b=
r>
&gt; <br>&gt; John P-G wrote:<br>&gt;&gt; Scott Tilley wrote:<br>&gt;&gt;&=
gt; Hi Graham<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt;&gt; All Canadian 600m stations=
 are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental Licenses and are not able to=
 communicate with the Amateur Service.<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; So VX9MRC shouldn&#39;t be having regular CW QSOs wi=
th EI0CF?<br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; Still confused....<br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;=
&gt; John<br>&gt;&gt; GM4SLV<br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt; <br>&gt; <b=
r>
<br><br><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br></blockquote>=
</div><br>

--001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706--