Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Received: from rly-db05.mx.aol.com (rly-db05.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.80]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDB042-ac34afd8a993d3; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:34:55 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db05.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB051-ac34afd8a993d3; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:34:34 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8z5W-0003oG-Uv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:30 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8z5V-0003o7-GR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000 Received: from mail-gx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.217.221]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>) id 1N8z5T-0007jZ-ME for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so3454964gxk.10 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:33:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=a5z/cfQEGwTEMgOuJJWiAKD5/ACUO7lkHKo3TKFUyzo=; b=nrhjqUio8DLcyeSoLH9uuO95YGAADW5GYk9UIWLHL6asyF71RDLTGfs5RaKGl/wV6D VDeKrosrb1vAWel+uNICOyUNA/5h5KQjcicCxX363KzdkNJVHAxRxcNhR7fdZnzLrZbR MmQYXLsqJYtfURtc/hrdxuMXDOVeH4YxnkeT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RsA7obrUBV6uKKT/hhEw1dgM/XBdoSaxCqEzTaeMK+qgPS9qYtuJtuQnaZgUPccugo P7oQ1jyQF/gj6PKL7P3AsgrNETtE+8KZii4Bp8IqESXYE4Wup4B75+9ovcC6Y1ivLJYS 9XCQOGIH5X26DAheeiSvTTv9IeM8g/xVAuKuE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.150.79 with SMTP id m15mr481946hbb.32.1258130000701; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:33:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <961313.39040.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <B27E914A546A4D91A7A1D084A23B07AC@AGB> <961313.39040.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:33:20 +0000 Message-ID: <fc7eccec0911130833r4947bcf9kb519c076ac7d9578@mail.gmail.com> From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m247.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 And who do you think would bother if you did work one ? Who would even care ? Andy www.g4jnt.com this email has been scanned for political correctness by the nanny state 2009/11/13 M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk> > The whole setup looks decidedly dodgy to me. If they are Pirates how > would it affect my license if the opportunity arose for me to work one and I > did? The only place I know where I am licensed work a non Amateur station is > on 5megs and that can only be a UK Mill station. > > It's a question of how much you value your license I suppose. > > 73 petefmt > > > --- On *Fri, 13/11/09, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>* wrote: > > > From: Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> > Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature > stations ?? > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Friday, 13 November, 2009, 14:53 > > Scott > > SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot coexist at close range for more than a > small fraction of a second because they collide with and annihilate each > other, releasing large quantities of energy in the form of gamma rays > > Got it now .. gamma rays are electromagnetic ..hence radio waves are > produced .. which may suffer (constructive interference) or (destructive > interference) resulting in large variations in amplitude at the point of > observation ..... > > Thanks ! > > G .. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net<http://uk.mc281.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sthed475@telus.net> > > > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<http://uk.mc281.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> > > > Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature > stations ?? > > > > > Hi John > > > > VX is in developmental service (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur > service... Like positive and negative antimatter they don't mix. > > > > 73 Scott > > > > > > John P-G wrote: > >> Scott Tilley wrote: > >>> Hi Graham > >>> > >>> All Canadian 600m stations are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental > Licenses and are not able to communicate with the Amateur Service. > >> > >> So VX9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs with EI0CF? > >> > >> Still confused.... > >> > >> John > >> GM4SLV > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > --001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div>And who do you think would bother if you did work one ?</div> <div>Who would even care ?</div> <div><br clear=3D"all">Andy<br><a href=3D"http://www.g4jnt.com">www.g4jnt.= com</a><br><br>this email has been scanned for political correctness by th= e nanny state<br><br><br></div> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/11/13 M0FMT <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href= =3D"mailto:m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk">m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span><br> <blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8e= x; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote"> <table border=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0"> <tbody> <tr> <td valign=3D"top"> <div><span>The whole setup looks=A0decidedly dodgy to me. If they are Pira= tes how would it affect my license if the opportunity arose for me to work= one and I did? The only place I know where I am licensed work a non Amate= ur station is on 5megs and that=A0can only be a UK Mill station.</span></d= iv> <div><span></span>=A0</div> <div><span>It's a question of how much you value your license I suppos= e.</span></div> <div><span></span>=A0</div> <div><span>73 petefmt</span></div> <div><br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 13/11/09, Graham <i><<a href=3D"mailto:g8fz= k@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk</a>></i>= </b> wrote:<br></div> <blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT:= 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><br>From: Graham <<a href=3D"mailto:g8fzk@g8fzk= .fsnet.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk</a>><br>Subject= : Re: <span><span>LF</span></span>: Are the new VE stations able to qso wi= th other amature stations ??<br> To: <a href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" target=3D"_blank">rsgb= _lf_group@blacksheep.org</a><br>Date: Friday, 13 November, 2009, 14:53<br>= <br> <div>Scott<br><br>SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot coexist at close ran= ge for more than a small fraction of a second because they collide with an= d annihilate each other, releasing large quantities of energy in the form= of gamma rays<br> <br>Got it=A0 now .. gamma rays are electromagnetic ..hence radio waves ar= e produced .. which may suffer=A0 (constructive interference) or (destruct= ive interference) resulting in large variations in amplitude at the point= of observation .....<br> <br>Thanks=A0 !<br><br>G ..<br><br>---------------------------------------= -----------<br>From: "Scott Tilley" <<a href=3D"http://uk.mc2= 81.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Dsthed475@telus.net" target=3D"_blank">st= hed475@telus.net</a>><br> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM<br>To: <<a href=3D"http://uk.mc= 281.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" target=3D= "_blank">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org</a>><br>Subject: Re: LF: Are the= =A0 new VE stations able to=A0 qso=A0 with=A0 other amature stations ??<br= > <br>> <br>> Hi John<br>> <br>> VX is in developmental service= (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur service... Like positive and ne= gative antimatter they don't mix.<br>> <br>> 73 Scott<br>> <b= r> > <br>> John P-G wrote:<br>>> Scott Tilley wrote:<br>>>&= gt; Hi Graham<br>>>> <br>>>> All Canadian 600m stations= are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental Licenses and are not able to= communicate with the Amateur Service.<br> >> <br>>> So VX9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs wi= th EI0CF?<br>>> <br>>> Still confused....<br>>> <br>>= > John<br>>> GM4SLV<br>>> <br>>> <br>> <br>> <b= r> <br><br><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br></blockquote>= </div><br> --001485f9a72cc5eb8d0478433706--