Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-dc03.mx.aol.com (rly-dc03.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.32]) by air-dc05.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC053-b11497a3067178; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:02:55 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc03.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC035-b11497a3067178; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:02:34 -0500
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1LQTA8-0007qV-3Q
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:02:00 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1LQTA7-0007qM-M8
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:01:59 +0000
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.188])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>)
	id 1LQTA6-00030h-OV
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:01:59 +0000
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e30so1501292fke.4
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:01:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=hdqvme8/aHEIrRn9AEjuM6jsZskwNN4Pwn+qvZxV2RM=;
        b=HwvqbCeZ6kEm6tMqK/tiqKoYOj0M/0uAOTD9JIMz9knXPjOC3vgizIEXa5nxc4tFom
         H81v9mLZY2nHiVh7kwX2Wurjx1VPUUqwAtdo1KlFgaPVDRkGcEc6CWd7xZ0IBuaSla3/
         K29uFpE278qYixj15MbukrxNSZ8N0QqEri9nM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Ttm7VlOEw8RgGJx0uirFUoOkWmAfHeNcyzjQglu+aYzEieZVjptXQGkpJx05mofTTw
         FW8dhO9OfFgsGFNBTX011SfHuPgXtd6nG7Om209bdlMAx44L53R2M8YSkOVKMV7wM+XL
         krkZGMFdmTNNmii0sGmh3o5KzqDGmaaAce9QA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.149.7 with SMTP id b7mr3833815bko.210.1232744516251; Fri, 
	23 Jan 2009 13:01:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <00e501c97d9d$0d918d70$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <002e01c97d73$3576f7f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
	 <006501c97d7b$3b80b570$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
	 <fc7eccec0901231029s52d4b6dv1a7fdaf88f3b110e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <00e501c97d9d$0d918d70$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:01:56 +0000
Message-ID: <fc7eccec0901231301s4ca4351i7a4364ddd38d90b7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Karma: unknown: 
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none
Subject: Re: LF: Re: rectifiers
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m210.1 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)


No, but I don't see any reason why they won't work at 50Hz just as
well as normal ones.
In fact better, due to the lower Vf.

Andy  G4JNT
www.g4jnt.com



2009/1/23 mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>:
> Andy
> Have you used these diodes in a linear psu
> mal/g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:29 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: rectifiers
>
>
>> Quite likely Schottky diodes.   Much lower forward voltage drop -
>> typical 0.15 to 0.3V at rated current, and OK for fasr SMPSUs.
>> Reverse leakage can be very high.
>>
>>
>> Andy  G4JNT
>> www.g4jnt.com
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/1/23 mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>:
>>>
>>> MF/LF
>>> For interest, nearly every diode that I have tested varies one from
>>> another
>>> even a matched batch. I suppose normally constructers just grab the
>>> required
>>> number for a project and start soldering. Perhaps its not that important
>>> as
>>> long as they are conducting in one direction and offer some resistance in
>>> the reverse direction.
>>> mal/g3kev
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: mal hamilton
>>> To: rsgb
>>> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 3:56 PM
>>> Subject: LF: rectifiers
>>> I have found some rectifiers MBR 6045 and although these would do the
>>> job, I
>>> notice the FORWARD/REVERSE resistance is a lot lower than normal silicon
>>> high curent rectifiers.
>>> de mal/g3kev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.12/1910 - Release Date:
>>> 1/22/2009
>>> 6:28 PM
>>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.12/1910 - Release Date: 1/22/2009
> 6:28 PM
>
>
>