DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=NiEFRFlZqgX8Hcu2zyN177KNSJXqblc7pv+79uezHA8nJZeLo7eEnmlkljdaCSWxbx
         VrHEaZjt+PO3eEHGEDCrSSM4sY1NKbnI/buaI3GhDmrAgzHThsOnM9VFwBFP2eMso0iz
         rBBMlZQdjpydZ8hDyllaoZhE2ztG2TSl9nB2k=
Message-ID: <fc7eccec0806191028s1b68e82akcf6a3b231ebc239f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:28:56 +0100
From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <485A7BC5.1080206@g3ysx.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <005301c8d182$93d802a0$0200a8c0@LapTop1>
	 <008f01c8d189$47145a20$0900a8c0@AM>
	 <fc7eccec0806190041k40fc5f87u119d293fc1faf5f0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <485A7BC5.1080206@g3ysx.org.uk>
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loran C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Good - I'm glad to know the telecomms opeators have thought about the
vulnerabilities inherent with putting all their eggs into the GPS
timing basket.  I had been told - clearly from a not too informed
source - that GPS timing units were used at each base station.

Does the same apply to 3G (or GSM for that matter) mobile networks as well?

Andy  G4JNT


2008/6/19 Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>:
> Andy Talbot wrote:
>>
>> The article has a very good point to make about GPS jamming though. I
>> think its probably the first time I've seen it talked about in the
>> open-press.  Our telecomms infrastructure now is so critically
>> dependent on accurate timing that a few well deployed low power
>> jammers could cause serious disruption.
>
> Although modern communications systems are dependent on sync,
> the current systems in the UK need frequency not time.
>
> Although the UK SDH networks use GPS for local time sources,
> to drive reference oscillators, all the systems I know
> use multiple Cesiums as a backup. Most other networks
> (for example the mobile phone networks) connect to
> an SDH network by some means or other and take their sync
> from that source.
>
> The big R&D problem in this space is how we manage the
> migration to packet networks with Ethernet delivery, and
> great lengths are being taken to avoid the need to rely
> on GPS for critical sync functions. Indeed GPS-only sync
> would be regarded as a show-stopper by all of the sync
> network designers I have spoken to.
>
> A lot of newer sync technology (the media access systems)
> needs relatively course (1us class) time as well as frequency
> to function, but there is work in hand to deliver that
> over packet networks (IEEE1588, IETF TICTOC etc)
>
> So I would not worry about GPS jamming disrupting comms.
>
> Navigation is a different matter, and as Alan says Loran
> is vulnerable, perhaps not quite as vulnerable as civilian
> GPS, but certainly more vulnerable than seems to be claimed.
>
> Stewart/G3YSX
>
>
>



-- 
Andy G4JNT
www.scrbg.org/g4jnt