DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=U0gtAM1LzM2VK/Ox9uC+saHWzQokRxeJ5s3xDvX4gn/hevEXZAwsawHsPjjeI2JD2jGNPCIIQFzkMCD+0dEwokrzfPOgM/R/oQBcu0N+/O+L6l6H6vmLqj9pb/J57/cmEmHr8q4h82Hf2qzvx39rSdKsqxxEtp/G5wZYyrn/1JE=
Message-ID: <fc7eccec0710250244r2f7a4501m2673d7cde66f6fc8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:44:17 +0100
From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <8E8D23D235D70840B6582917DF27898006935B1D@temps153538.tms-ltd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8E8D23D235D70840B6582917DF27898006935B1D@temps153538.tms-ltd.com>
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: RADCOM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


How about writing a few letters to the editor about the appalling
tabloid route the Radcomic is taking?

Giles (editor)  himself is a bit concerned about the route the comic
is moving, but I get the feeling he is being pushed by the RSGB Mafia,
sorry the Board.   The two job titles that used to run the magazine
were "Editor" and "Technical Editor"    now   they are "Managing
Editor" and  "Features Editor" .  That sez it all!

Andy  G4JNT


On 25/10/2007, Reeves Paul <Paul.Reeves@uk.thalesgroup.com> wrote:
> How about the strange new appearances? I was intrigued by 'Radio Sports' and
> had visions of pole vaulting with 136KHz verticals, throwing the FT817 and
> weight lifting with the R-390. But no, just more contests.....
>
> 73s
> Paul   g8gja
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Talbot [mailto:andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 24 October 2007 10:53
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: RADCOM
>
>
> My Radcom seems to be missing all the technical articles -
> In fact, I don't recall seeing them in any issue over the last year or so.
>
> Who else has noticed this unfortunate trend for sections to go missing :-(
>
> Andy  G4JNT
>
>
> On 24/10/2007, John GM4SLV <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:40:58 -0000
> > "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Has Radcom ceased production. No sign of it this month.
> > >
> > > G3KEV
> > >
> > >
> > Hi Mal
> >
> > I got mine yesterday, all the way up here. In the same delivery
> > was this month's QST and on Monday this quarter's SPRAT. Too much to
> > read, so little time!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
>
> This email, including any attachment, is a confidential communication
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed. It contains information which is private and may be proprietary
> or covered by legal professional privilege. If you have received this email
> in error, please notify the sender upon receipt, and immediately delete it
> from your system.
>
> Anything contained in this email that is not connected with the businesses
> of this company is neither endorsed by nor is the liability of this company.
>
> Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachment to
> this email has been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any
> damage sustained as a result of software viruses, and would advise that you
> carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
>
>
>