Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28534 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 17:12:35 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 25 Oct 2002 17:12:35 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 3347 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 17:12:28 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Oct 2002 17:12:28 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 1857zn-00045G-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:11:39 +0100 Received: from [152.163.225.101] (helo=imo-r05.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1857zm-000457-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:11:38 +0100 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id l.fb.2ea8098a (25305) for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:11:05 -0400 (EDT) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:11:04 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: Spam via reflector Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group In a message dated 10/25/02 4:33:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, dsergeant@connectfree.co.uk writes: << Perhaps the time has come to change this reflector into a 'subscribers only can post' system. Despite objections raised in the past most other mailing lists operate that way and it certainly would kill these time wasting mails. >> This proposal has my endorsement, for what it's worth. I do not see the point of allowing people to post to this or any other list, who themselves are unable to read what has been posted there. Not only does it encourage promulgation of spam, that's about the only thing it CAN do in practice. Who can truly contribute to any discussion if they are unaware of what is currently going on in that discussion? Would we, in our parliaments or legislatures or general assemblies, willingly elect representatives who only show up long enough to deliver their own speech and then go home without hearing what any of the other members say? There is nothing restrictive or exclusive about who is permitted to subscribe to this list. So I say, let those who sign up to listen be also the ones permitted to speak. Regards, John Davis