Return-Path: Received: from rly-me02.mx.aol.com (rly-me02.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.35]) by air-me03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINME031-9a04b222361135; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:48:23 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me02.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME024-9a04b222361135; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:48:03 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NJ31g-0005WR-TO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:47:08 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NJ31g-0005WI-Do for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:47:08 +0000 Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com ([209.85.219.223]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ31f-0007Tk-CP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:47:08 +0000 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so865565ewy.4 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:47:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PBnS+MUNQZoNlA4wfjdZG0iCqSUInaByz7irkNRz814=; b=b9m6DT/UGuMnYmVSdC6GATqu4+T283XFvOpy4GMjqhNNkqUG60TQ9QG5qdNtrJIlZv 22AH2Vcz1zRqA7A+OPimp18JZKdR6Q2gsGexMuLxEPo4+JkV7Z8uzAl6ZE9J/oOPV/UC KuXyelalGlCSxn+++jtjC1rYdg3PCR5uXEy0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=x1Ycbs044lxd/B9By1XOovbVowABIzh8o7G4z9DkZ3fWxHS+rZYsF4wizeBu4urKtw hLZ4/2OuCuZv9pB1GJe091dj1E2BAWZSj9XpGUVCQehpfwxehqn/EvbjKiyqjVn6wn9H HSU0b+oCa2Q92AKZjdnAx52d7ml7SlZR/ODjI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.143 with SMTP id a15mr148374wef.206.1260478029919; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:47:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <150809.55455.qm@web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <150809.55455.qm@web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:47:09 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ad009aa7e37c770a Message-ID: From: John Gould To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.881,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126 Subject: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d6454e387689047a65e9c4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d230.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e6d6454e387689047a65e9c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Several of us on this reflector are actively involved in the preparatory work, both within the ITU-R and CEPT WRC preparation structures. We don't lack input from people experienced in these types of meetings, but we are seeking support from national societies particularly in those countries where Amateur activity is currently permitted around 500kHz. Thus, any encouragement that can be given to your national society to become engaged in the work would be really welcome. The way this can be done is for the HF Manager, or similar, of a national societies to join the Region 1 500kHz Working Group. Rik, ON7YD or I can supply further info if necessary. 73 John, G3WKL 2009/12/10 M0FMT > FYI ?? > > *"There is opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime > service via the International Maritime Organisation and this has led to > France presenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that suggests a use for > the band 495-505 kHz using datamodes. This was in response to papers from > Canada and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur band between 493 and > 510(515) kHz. There appears to be no commercial or technical reasoning > behind this paper and it is suspected to be based on emotive grounds > only. Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requires a lot more support if > it is going to be successful."* > > 73 petefmt > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- John, G3WKL --0016e6d6454e387689047a65e9c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Several of us on this reflector are actively involved in the preparatory= work, both within the ITU-R and CEPT WRC preparation structures.=A0 We do= n't lack input from people experienced in these types of meetings, but= we are seeking support from national societies particularly in those coun= tries where Amateur activity is currently permitted around 500kHz.=A0 Thus= , any encouragement that can be given to your national society to become= engaged in the work would be really welcome.=A0=A0 The way this can be do= ne is for the HF Manager, or similar, of a national societies to join the= Region 1 500kHz Working Group.=A0 Rik, ON7YD or I can supply further info= if necessary.

73 John, G3WKL

2009/12/10 M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>

F= YI=A0 ??=20

"Th= ere is opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime service vi= a the International Maritime Organisation and this has led to France presenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that= suggests a use for the band 495-505 kHz using datamodes.=A0=A0This was in= response to papers from Canada and the UK that proposed a secondary amate= ur band between 493 and 510(515) kHz.=A0=A0There appears to be no commerci= al or technical reasoning behind this paper and it is suspected to be base= d on emotive grounds only.=A0=A0Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requir= es a lot more support if it is going to be successful."= =20

73 petefmt




--
John, G3WK= L
--0016e6d6454e387689047a65e9c4--