Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19668 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 00:30:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 May 2000 00:30:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12rrev-0004m2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 May 2000 01:25:57 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.34]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12rreu-0004lw-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 May 2000 01:25:56 +0100 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v26.7.) id l.e8.478961b (4368) for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 20:24:58 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: MarkusVester@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 20:24:57 EDT Subject: Re: LF: QRP award, IK1ODO beacon To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 64 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Marco, >[I propose a QRP award for the best bit-per-sec-per-km-per-mW >performance. Anyone willing to think the rules?] ... excellent idea! Perhaps we should even use ...per-km-squared... as that would be proportional to power density. And we might have to set a minimum distance like lambda/(2*pi) to exclude the near-field zone. BTW: Your 10 mW DFCW was OOO here a couple of weeks ago with spectrogram, very interesting indeed. But tonight I can't see anything through the qrn. 73 de Markus, DF6NM